From ssteinerx at gmail.com Mon Mar 1 22:24:44 2010
From: ssteinerx at gmail.com (ssteinerX@gmail.com)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:24:44 -0500
Subject: [Catalog-sig] [Python-Dev] Status of PEP 381
In-Reply-To: <94bdd2611003011259v56aa6ccaq430fe7ed6e73b504@mail.gmail.com>
References: <bc8ec34e1003011145y6223ba16y68a209c0bb1c961c@mail.gmail.com>
<94bdd2611003011259v56aa6ccaq430fe7ed6e73b504@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <925BC7D2-3B85-4E80-A8A1-0D80CDEC71B6@gmail.com>
On Mar 1, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Tarek Ziad? wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <jacob at jacobian.org> wrote:
>> Hey folks --
>>
>> Can someone point me to some information on what's going on with PEP
>> 381 (PyPI mirroring)? There's a bunch of XXX'd material, and it
>> doesn't appear that pypi.python.org implements the statistics or
>> providing parts.
>>
>> I'd be willing -- happy, actually -- to fill in the missing pieces,
>> but only if I'm not stepping on anyone's toes. I'd also need some help
>> adding code to pypi.python.org if that's a necessary part -- I'm not
>> very good at finding my way around that codebase.
>
> Hey Jacob,
>
> I have started to implement the server parts (some are already
> available at pypi but not activated) and Martin worked on the client
> part on his side to provide a library for mirrors. I need to finish
> editing the PEP text but any help is welcome of course on any part.
>
> As Terry suggested you can send a mail at Catalog, I'll catch up on
> the thread once its started, to list possible tasks.
Tarek,
Where is the server code? I had a version working about a month ago but put it on hold 'till after PyCon.
I might be able to give whatever you have a boost with some already tested and working code.
Thanks,
S
From exarkun at twistedmatrix.com Thu Mar 4 02:30:53 2010
From: exarkun at twistedmatrix.com (exarkun at twistedmatrix.com)
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:30:53 -0000
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Requesting ownership of the package "Twisted Pair"
In-Reply-To: <20091126022212.26747.592998136.divmod.xquotient.45@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20091126022212.26747.592998136.divmod.xquotient.45@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <20100304013053.2792.1076458428.divmod.xquotient.497@localhost.localdomain>
On 26 Nov 2009, 02:22 am, exarkun at twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Can the "Twisted Pair" owner on PyPI be changed to me? Whoever
>registered the account "twisted" has forgotten about it. My PyPI
>username is "exarkun".
... bump.
>Thanks,
>Jean-Paul
>_______________________________________________
>Catalog-SIG mailing list
>Catalog-SIG at python.org
>http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
From tseaver at palladion.com Mon Mar 8 15:36:59 2010
From: tseaver at palladion.com (Tres Seaver)
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:36:59 -0500
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Where is the link? (Was Re: Documentation hosting)
In-Reply-To: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de>
References: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin v. L?wis wrote:
> I have now made the experimental documentation hosting service available.
>
> Please try it out, and report any problems that you see.
Every time I go to upload documentation (not that often), I spend five
to fifteen minutes trying to find the page which contains this form.
Can we make it more prominent somehow? Or at least have the directions
for finding it be on the list so that I can search for it next time?
Thanks!
Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkuVC4UACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7vSQCffHYryVbURWkDRWT8DriCj8ma
/gYAn09ZK6Cc0hfh+5yNtqP9071FBguL
=eEtR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From martin at v.loewis.de Mon Mar 8 22:36:11 2010
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:36:11 +0100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Where is the link? (Was Re: Documentation hosting)
In-Reply-To: <4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com>
References: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de> <4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com>
Message-ID: <4B956DCB.8070902@v.loewis.de>
Tres Seaver wrote:
> Martin v. L?wis wrote:
>
>> I have now made the experimental documentation hosting service available.
>
>> Please try it out, and report any problems that you see.
>
> Every time I go to upload documentation (not that often), I spend five
> to fifteen minutes trying to find the page which contains this form.
> Can we make it more prominent somehow? Or at least have the directions
> for finding it be on the list so that I can search for it next time?
I can make it more prominent, if You tell me how to.
Regards,
Martin
From tseaver at palladion.com Mon Mar 8 22:45:34 2010
From: tseaver at palladion.com (Tres Seaver)
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:45:34 -0500
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Where is the link? (Was Re: Documentation hosting)
In-Reply-To: <4B956DCB.8070902@v.loewis.de>
References: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de> <4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com>
<4B956DCB.8070902@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <4B956FFE.9080600@palladion.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin v. L?wis wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Martin v. L?wis wrote:
>>
>>> I have now made the experimental documentation hosting service available.
>>> Please try it out, and report any problems that you see.
>> Every time I go to upload documentation (not that often), I spend five
>> to fifteen minutes trying to find the page which contains this form.
>> Can we make it more prominent somehow? Or at least have the directions
>> for finding it be on the list so that I can search for it next time?
>
> I can make it more prominent, if You tell me how to.
Can you tell me where to find it? If so, I might be able to suggest a
UI change.
Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkuVb/kACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ6i7wCeIE/hqIIA5SswMafUVMJKjTDq
w9MAn3TNQrPfZXanzau0MC+1gsZ4yim2
=TLQe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From martin at v.loewis.de Mon Mar 8 22:55:53 2010
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:55:53 +0100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Where is the link? (Was Re: Documentation hosting)
In-Reply-To: <4B956FFE.9080600@palladion.com>
References: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de>
<4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com> <4B956DCB.8070902@v.loewis.de>
<4B956FFE.9080600@palladion.com>
Message-ID: <4B957269.5070001@v.loewis.de>
> Can you tell me where to find it? If so, I might be able to suggest a
> UI change.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit&name=your_package_here
(select from list on the top-right corner of your browser screen)
Regards,
Martin
From tseaver at palladion.com Mon Mar 8 23:05:56 2010
From: tseaver at palladion.com (Tres Seaver)
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:05:56 -0500
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Where is the link? (Was Re: Documentation hosting)
In-Reply-To: <4B957269.5070001@v.loewis.de>
References: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de>
<4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com> <4B956DCB.8070902@v.loewis.de>
<4B956FFE.9080600@palladion.com> <4B957269.5070001@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <4B9574C4.1060908@palladion.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin v. L?wis wrote:
>> Can you tell me where to find it? If so, I might be able to suggest a
>> UI change.
>
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit&name=your_package_here
> (select from list on the top-right corner of your browser screen)
That's why I can't find it! That link is a different page than the
"edit" link visible at the top of each package page (the "Package: admin
| view | edit | files | PKG-INFO" links). The "edit" link in that menu
is for editing the PKG-INFO for the displayed release, rather than for
managing the project as a whole. Could we add a link into that list
which corresponds to the 'pkg_edit' action?
Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkuVdMQACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7ocQCdEIwFSIlour3ODhpwDg9/Tcgi
hekAnj/Jlv/yERSCOTKs/sRjngPy0koY
=UgsM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From martin at v.loewis.de Mon Mar 8 23:18:53 2010
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:18:53 +0100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Where is the link? (Was Re: Documentation hosting)
In-Reply-To: <4B9574C4.1060908@palladion.com>
References: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de>
<4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com> <4B956DCB.8070902@v.loewis.de>
<4B956FFE.9080600@palladion.com> <4B957269.5070001@v.loewis.de>
<4B9574C4.1060908@palladion.com>
Message-ID: <4B9577CD.1030601@v.loewis.de>
Tres Seaver wrote:
> Martin v. L?wis wrote:
>>> Can you tell me where to find it? If so, I might be able to suggest a
>>> UI change.
>> http://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit&name=your_package_here
>> (select from list on the top-right corner of your browser screen)
>
> That's why I can't find it! That link is a different page than the
> "edit" link visible at the top of each package page (the "Package: admin
> | view | edit | files | PKG-INFO" links). The "edit" link in that menu
> is for editing the PKG-INFO for the displayed release, rather than for
> managing the project as a whole. Could we add a link into that list
> which corresponds to the 'pkg_edit' action?
What should be the exact position and label of that link?
"We" can add anything that "we" want.
Regards,
Martin
From tseaver at palladion.com Mon Mar 8 23:42:20 2010
From: tseaver at palladion.com (Tres Seaver)
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:42:20 -0500
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Where is the link? (Was Re: Documentation hosting)
In-Reply-To: <4B9577CD.1030601@v.loewis.de>
References: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de> <4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com> <4B956DCB.8070902@v.loewis.de> <4B956FFE.9080600@palladion.com>
<4B957269.5070001@v.loewis.de> <4B9574C4.1060908@palladion.com>
<4B9577CD.1030601@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <4B957D4C.7020306@palladion.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin v. L?wis wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Martin v. L?wis wrote:
>>>> Can you tell me where to find it? If so, I might be able to suggest a
>>>> UI change.
>>> http://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit&name=your_package_here
>>> (select from list on the top-right corner of your browser screen)
>> That's why I can't find it! That link is a different page than the
>> "edit" link visible at the top of each package page (the "Package: admin
>> | view | edit | files | PKG-INFO" links). The "edit" link in that menu
>> is for editing the PKG-INFO for the displayed release, rather than for
>> managing the project as a whole. Could we add a link into that list
>> which corresponds to the 'pkg_edit' action?
>
> What should be the exact position and label of that link?
I propose putting the link immediately to the right of the "admin" link,
with the label "releases" (since it is primarily for managing the
visibility of releases).
Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkuVfUYACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ5AJgCeOLAZgmz4VNDeQxzcSibbYnt6
50wAn0a2nmwKq9R0k8+PcQFPswbg/o9E
=FI+B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From martin at v.loewis.de Tue Mar 9 00:27:40 2010
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:27:40 +0100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Where is the link? (Was Re: Documentation hosting)
In-Reply-To: <4B957D4C.7020306@palladion.com>
References: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de> <4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com> <4B956DCB.8070902@v.loewis.de> <4B956FFE.9080600@palladion.com> <4B957269.5070001@v.loewis.de> <4B9574C4.1060908@palladion.com> <4B9577CD.1030601@v.loewis.de>
<4B957D4C.7020306@palladion.com>
Message-ID: <4B9587EC.9080808@v.loewis.de>
> I propose putting the link immediately to the right of the "admin" link,
> with the label "releases" (since it is primarily for managing the
> visibility of releases).
Done.
Martin
From tseaver at palladion.com Tue Mar 9 17:36:14 2010
From: tseaver at palladion.com (Tres Seaver)
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:36:14 -0500
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Where is the link? (Was Re: Documentation hosting)
In-Reply-To: <4B9587EC.9080808@v.loewis.de>
References: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de> <4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com> <4B956DCB.8070902@v.loewis.de> <4B956FFE.9080600@palladion.com> <4B957269.5070001@v.loewis.de> <4B9574C4.1060908@palladion.com> <4B9577CD.1030601@v.loewis.de>
<4B957D4C.7020306@palladion.com> <4B9587EC.9080808@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <4B9678FE.7010401@palladion.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin v. L?wis wrote:
>> I propose putting the link immediately to the right of the "admin" link,
>> with the label "releases" (since it is primarily for managing the
>> visibility of releases).
>
> Done.
Thank you very much!
Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkuWePoACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7reQCfbhVXbR9K2Sqp1KgyelNJOjSS
y1UAniSH+QCKT0FxBH4/LNRR59QiOAha
=j0jO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From benji at benjiyork.com Tue Mar 9 17:54:06 2010
From: benji at benjiyork.com (Benji York)
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:54:06 -0500
Subject: [Catalog-sig] showing a complete list of packages I have access
to?
In-Reply-To: <e5fff6640912180516w49ec1343l5f49fb75f02b5ea8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <hge4en$3s6$1@ger.gmane.org> <4B2ACB19.9090104@v.loewis.de>
<e5fff6640912180516w49ec1343l5f49fb75f02b5ea8@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e5fff6641003090854u5ff301fdtbe926cf00647c5e@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Benji York <benji at benjiyork.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:21 PM, "Martin v. L?wis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>> See
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2906878&group_id=66150&atid=513503
>
> Done.
Is there anything else I can do to help on this issue?
--
Benji York
From ben+python at benfinney.id.au Tue Mar 9 00:50:15 2010
From: ben+python at benfinney.id.au (Ben Finney)
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:50:15 +1100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Where is the link?
References: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de> <4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com>
<4B956DCB.8070902@v.loewis.de> <4B956FFE.9080600@palladion.com>
<4B957269.5070001@v.loewis.de> <4B9574C4.1060908@palladion.com>
<4B9577CD.1030601@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <878wa2z83s.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
"Martin v. L?wis" <martin at v.loewis.de> writes:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
> > Martin v. L?wis wrote:
> >>> Can you tell me where to find it? If so, I might be able to
> >>> suggest a UI change.
> >> http://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit&name=your_package_here
> >> (select from list on the top-right corner of your browser screen)
> >
> > That's why I can't find it! That link is a different page than the
> > "edit" link visible at the top of each package page (the "Package: admin
> > | view | edit | files | PKG-INFO" links). The "edit" link in that menu
> > is for editing the PKG-INFO for the displayed release, rather than for
> > managing the project as a whole. Could we add a link into that list
> > which corresponds to the 'pkg_edit' action?
>
> What should be the exact position and label of that link?
That's up to you, really, as the hand at the helm for the design of the
site. The user is expressing a need; that need has to be addressed in
the context of what all the other users need, including the need for a
consistent UI.
It's not appropriate for each user to design individual pieces of the
UI, otherwise the result will inevitably be an inconsistent mess.
--
\ ?I have the simplest tastes. I am always satisfied with the |
`\ best.? ?Oscar Wilde |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
From tjreedy at udel.edu Tue Mar 9 19:11:05 2010
From: tjreedy at udel.edu (Terry Reedy)
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:11:05 -0500
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Where is the link?
In-Reply-To: <878wa2z83s.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
References: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de>
<4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com> <4B956DCB.8070902@v.loewis.de>
<4B956FFE.9080600@palladion.com> <4B957269.5070001@v.loewis.de>
<4B9574C4.1060908@palladion.com> <4B9577CD.1030601@v.loewis.de>
<878wa2z83s.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
Message-ID: <hn62vk$f0m$1@dough.gmane.org>
On 3/8/2010 6:50 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> "Martin v. L?wis"<martin at v.loewis.de> writes:
>> What should be the exact position and label of that link?
>
> That's up to you, really, as the hand at the helm for the design of the
> site. The user is expressing a need; that need has to be addressed in
> the context of what all the other users need, including the need for a
> consistent UI.
>
> It's not appropriate for each user to design individual pieces of the
> UI, otherwise the result will inevitably be an inconsistent mess.
You must have had a bad night last night. Python, its docs, and site are
nothing but *filtered* collaborative efforts. It is appropriate for
users to do the harder work of suggesting solutions to problems in
addition to the easier work of presenting problems. We need more of
that, not less. Busy component managers can then accept, reject, or
modify (including for consistency).
Terry Jan Reedy
From noah at coderanger.net Tue Mar 9 19:24:50 2010
From: noah at coderanger.net (Noah Kantrowitz)
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:24:50 -0800
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Where is the link?
In-Reply-To: <hn62vk$f0m$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de>
<4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com> <4B956DCB.8070902@v.loewis.de>
<4B956FFE.9080600@palladion.com> <4B957269.5070001@v.loewis.de>
<4B9574C4.1060908@palladion.com> <4B9577CD.1030601@v.loewis.de>
<878wa2z83s.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <hn62vk$f0m$1@dough.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <1EF82A99-624B-4B61-AAD3-57FA2D68F578@coderanger.net>
On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 3/8/2010 6:50 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>> "Martin v. L?wis"<martin at v.loewis.de> writes:
>>> What should be the exact position and label of that link?
>>
>> That's up to you, really, as the hand at the helm for the design of
>> the
>> site. The user is expressing a need; that need has to be addressed in
>> the context of what all the other users need, including the need
>> for a
>> consistent UI.
>>
>> It's not appropriate for each user to design individual pieces of the
>> UI, otherwise the result will inevitably be an inconsistent mess.
>
> You must have had a bad night last night. Python, its docs, and site
> are nothing but *filtered* collaborative efforts. It is appropriate
> for users to do the harder work of suggesting solutions to problems
> in addition to the easier work of presenting problems. We need more
> of that, not less. Busy component managers can then accept, reject,
> or modify (including for consistency).
Unless, of course, you are offering to do it all :-)
--Noah
From chris at simplistix.co.uk Thu Mar 11 14:47:37 2010
From: chris at simplistix.co.uk (Chris Withers)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:47:37 +0000
Subject: [Catalog-sig] Where is the link? (Was Re: Documentation hosting)
In-Reply-To: <4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com>
References: <489AD36C.9030707@v.loewis.de> <4B950B8B.5080004@palladion.com>
Message-ID: <4B98F479.2040501@simplistix.co.uk>
Tres Seaver wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Martin v. L?wis wrote:
>
>> I have now made the experimental documentation hosting service available.
>>
>> Please try it out, and report any problems that you see.
>
> Every time I go to upload documentation (not that often), I spend five
> to fifteen minutes trying to find the page which contains this form.
> Can we make it more prominent somehow? Or at least have the directions
> for finding it be on the list so that I can search for it next time?
I just use sphinx-upload and never have to remember anything:
http://packages.python.org/errorhandler/development.html#making-a-release
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
From renesd at gmail.com Sat Mar 13 13:22:31 2010
From: renesd at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Dudfield?=)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:22:31 +0000
Subject: [Catalog-sig] categories for alternative pythons and python likes?
pypy/ironpython/jython/shedskin/pymite/etc
Message-ID: <64ddb72c1003130422m31387c4aw4e2bd55f7dab7fa4@mail.gmail.com>
hi,
categories for different python implementations would be useful on pypi.
If only to know which modules are tested by various package authors on
different implementations.
Maybe something like this:
Programming Language :: PyPy
Programming Language :: PyPy :: 1.2
Programming Language :: Jython
Programming Language :: Iron Python
Programming Language :: Shed Skin
Programming Language :: PyMite
Programming Language :: tinypy
Programming Language :: tinypyC++
Programming Language :: Pyjamas
If you like I can gather all of the version numbers for them too?
cheers,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20100313/21a99ce1/attachment.html>
From martin at v.loewis.de Sat Mar 13 13:37:45 2010
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:37:45 +0100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] categories for alternative pythons and python
likes? pypy/ironpython/jython/shedskin/pymite/etc
In-Reply-To: <64ddb72c1003130422m31387c4aw4e2bd55f7dab7fa4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <64ddb72c1003130422m31387c4aw4e2bd55f7dab7fa4@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4B9B8719.8060100@v.loewis.de>
> categories for different python implementations would be useful on pypi.
Per proposed category: which existing packages would be classified in
this category?
Regards,
Martin
From renesd at gmail.com Sat Mar 13 14:03:32 2010
From: renesd at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Dudfield?=)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:03:32 +0000
Subject: [Catalog-sig] categories for alternative pythons and python
likes? pypy/ironpython/jython/shedskin/pymite/etc
In-Reply-To: <4B9B8719.8060100@v.loewis.de>
References: <64ddb72c1003130422m31387c4aw4e2bd55f7dab7fa4@mail.gmail.com>
<4B9B8719.8060100@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <64ddb72c1003130503i25adf5e5k8020f1c1db3d0645@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:37 PM, "Martin v. L?wis" <martin at v.loewis.de>wrote:
> > categories for different python implementations would be useful on pypi.
>
> Per proposed category: which existing packages would be classified in
> this category?
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
Hi Martin,
I'm not sure exactly :) Django has jython/pypy/ironpython support for
example. Twisted, pyglet, pywebsite, cherrypy and others support pypy.
Should I make a bigger list?
cu,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20100313/70719d03/attachment.html>
From martin at v.loewis.de Sat Mar 13 15:22:36 2010
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:22:36 +0100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] categories for alternative pythons and
python likes? pypy/ironpython/jython/shedskin/pymite/etc
In-Reply-To: <64ddb72c1003130503i25adf5e5k8020f1c1db3d0645@mail.gmail.com>
References: <64ddb72c1003130422m31387c4aw4e2bd55f7dab7fa4@mail.gmail.com> <4B9B8719.8060100@v.loewis.de>
<64ddb72c1003130503i25adf5e5k8020f1c1db3d0645@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4B9B9FAC.7070100@v.loewis.de>
> I'm not sure exactly :) Django has jython/pypy/ironpython support for
> example. Twisted, pyglet, pywebsite, cherrypy and others support pypy.
>
> Should I make a bigger list?
That, or propose fewer categories. I don't really want to introduce
categories that serve no actual purpose.
The question then really is: how to get package authors to actually use
these categories?
Regards,
Martin
From fdrake at gmail.com Sat Mar 13 17:03:43 2010
From: fdrake at gmail.com (Fred Drake)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:03:43 -0500
Subject: [Catalog-sig] categories for alternative pythons and python
likes? pypy/ironpython/jython/shedskin/pymite/etc
In-Reply-To: <4B9B9FAC.7070100@v.loewis.de>
References: <64ddb72c1003130422m31387c4aw4e2bd55f7dab7fa4@mail.gmail.com>
<4B9B8719.8060100@v.loewis.de>
<64ddb72c1003130503i25adf5e5k8020f1c1db3d0645@mail.gmail.com>
<4B9B9FAC.7070100@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <9cee7ab81003130803p3444d715y5220c8e58b08515c@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:22 AM, "Martin v. L?wis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> The question then really is: how to get package authors to actually use
> these categories?
The real problem with categories like this is that if they only
indicate that the package has been tested (and the tests pass) with
that implementation of Python, there's no way to tell if the tests
failed with another implementation, or if they simply weren't run.
I'd use them if we could also indicate that the package doesn't work
with certain implementations. This would also apply to some other
groups other classifiers, such as those for the operating system.
Perhaps there should be something like a "not :: <classifier>" as
well, to indicate known non-support for operating system or Python
implementation (or possibly other things, but not sure what else at
this time).
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com>
"Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller
From martin at v.loewis.de Sat Mar 13 17:57:17 2010
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:57:17 +0100
Subject: [Catalog-sig] categories for alternative pythons and python
likes? pypy/ironpython/jython/shedskin/pymite/etc
In-Reply-To: <9cee7ab81003130803p3444d715y5220c8e58b08515c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <64ddb72c1003130422m31387c4aw4e2bd55f7dab7fa4@mail.gmail.com>
<4B9B8719.8060100@v.loewis.de>
<64ddb72c1003130503i25adf5e5k8020f1c1db3d0645@mail.gmail.com>
<4B9B9FAC.7070100@v.loewis.de>
<9cee7ab81003130803p3444d715y5220c8e58b08515c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4B9BC3ED.2020800@v.loewis.de>
> The real problem with categories like this is that if they only
> indicate that the package has been tested (and the tests pass) with
> that implementation of Python, there's no way to tell if the tests
> failed with another implementation, or if they simply weren't run.
I don't see this as a problem. What I want to know, as a user, is
whether the package is supported on some platform. If the author has
declared support, I can expect that it is supported. If the author has
not declared support, it means that the package is not supported -
whether or not the package actually works, or could be made to work.
If the package is not supported on, say, Jython, I can still test
whether it works, and port it if it doesn't.
Regards,
Martin
From simon at ikanobori.jp Tue Mar 30 16:22:45 2010
From: simon at ikanobori.jp (Simon de Vlieger)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:22:45 +0200
Subject: [Catalog-sig] A PyPi question
References: <82532999-788B-422F-BB07-A145FD06582A@ikanobori.jp>
Message-ID: <931AC8F2-9DCC-45EF-8924-03138428D51B@ikanobori.jp>
Dear all,
I first adressed this question to the distutils-sig mailing list and
was kindly told to post this question to this mailinglist so here it
goes.
The XMLRPC API documentation for PyPi at http://wiki.python.org/moin/PyPiXmlRpc
contains a 'downloads' key in the example. However in the
documentation below it is missing and my own tries at the API confirm
this.
Now I would very much like to have access to the data (especially the
download count). Is there any possibility of these values returning?
Regards,
Simon de Vlieger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20100330/51500cfa/attachment.html>
From ziade.tarek at gmail.com Tue Mar 30 17:17:07 2010
From: ziade.tarek at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tarek_Ziad=E9?=)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:17:07 +0200
Subject: [Catalog-sig] A PyPi question
In-Reply-To: <931AC8F2-9DCC-45EF-8924-03138428D51B@ikanobori.jp>
References: <82532999-788B-422F-BB07-A145FD06582A@ikanobori.jp>
<931AC8F2-9DCC-45EF-8924-03138428D51B@ikanobori.jp>
Message-ID: <94bdd2611003300817w1a4a1c98n440f3b341d251c2b@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Simon de Vlieger <simon at ikanobori.jp> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I first adressed this question to the distutils-sig mailing list and was
> kindly told to post this question to this mailinglist so here it goes.
>
> The XMLRPC API documentation for PyPi at
> http://wiki.python.org/moin/PyPiXmlRpc contains a 'downloads' key in the
> example. However in the documentation below it is missing and my own tries
> at the API confirm this.
>
> Now I would very much like to have access to the data (especially the
> download count). Is there any possibility of these values returning?
>
> Regards,
As far as I can see, the download count is not exposed (anymore ?) in
the release_data XMLRPC method, but it shouldn't be hard to add it
back since it's directly accessible in the storage
(built through a cron that reads the apache stats)
It just requires one extra call to `store.list_files(package_name, version)`
Let's see what Martin says.. :)
Regards
Tarek
--
Tarek Ziad? | http://ziade.org
From simon at ikanobori.jp Tue Mar 30 21:33:35 2010
From: simon at ikanobori.jp (Simon de Vlieger)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:33:35 +0200
Subject: [Catalog-sig] A PyPi question
In-Reply-To: <94bdd2611003300817w1a4a1c98n440f3b341d251c2b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <82532999-788B-422F-BB07-A145FD06582A@ikanobori.jp>
<931AC8F2-9DCC-45EF-8924-03138428D51B@ikanobori.jp>
<94bdd2611003300817w1a4a1c98n440f3b341d251c2b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ED858E77-0A79-4A1D-AD03-47B1CBAB2405@ikanobori.jp>
Tarek,
I see that Martin has responded in the distutils-sig post I adressed
there.
He suggested I should create a feature request at the sourceforge
project page for pypi. I will pursue that route.
Regards,
Simon de Vlieger
On 30 mrt 2010, at 17:17, Tarek Ziad? wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Simon de Vlieger
> <simon at ikanobori.jp> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I first adressed this question to the distutils-sig mailing list
>> and was
>> kindly told to post this question to this mailinglist so here it
>> goes.
>>
>> The XMLRPC API documentation for PyPi at
>> http://wiki.python.org/moin/PyPiXmlRpc contains a 'downloads' key
>> in the
>> example. However in the documentation below it is missing and my
>> own tries
>> at the API confirm this.
>>
>> Now I would very much like to have access to the data (especially the
>> download count). Is there any possibility of these values returning?
>>
>> Regards,
>
> As far as I can see, the download count is not exposed (anymore ?) in
> the release_data XMLRPC method, but it shouldn't be hard to add it
> back since it's directly accessible in the storage
> (built through a cron that reads the apache stats)
>
> It just requires one extra call to `store.list_files(package_name,
> version)`
>
> Let's see what Martin says.. :)
>
> Regards
> Tarek
> --
> Tarek Ziad? | http://ziade.org