[Catalog-sig] The "Softpedia" spam

Noah Kantrowitz noah at coderanger.net
Fri May 7 09:49:33 CEST 2010

On May 7, 2010, at 12:47 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:

> Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
>> I think most FOSS authors are aware that putting their email in a package is effectively putting it in the clear on the internet. I think we have come beyond the days of "noah (at) coderanger [dot] net" and all those silly tricks that were popular not too long ago. If an author is excessively concerned about spam, they shouldn't put their email in author_email. Is that field mandatory now or something? Softpedia is a little annoying with the emails, but I've found them useful personally (along with versiontracker) when looking for OS X software before. Freshmeat is a similar index of FOSS projects, and I've definitely used that before. Is there some reason we are objecting to including PyPI data in other software catalogs? If it makes it a tiny bit easier to find Python software, I'm all for it.
> No, but the PSF should be asked for permission before using the data
> on some other site.

Permission is probably not a good thing to inject, too much risk of being picky on who can use the data. If it is available to anyone, it should be available to all. I would agree that as a professional courtesy it would be nice if people would let us know if they are mining PyPI, but you are dipping into dangerous territory if you put a gate in front of it.


More information about the Catalog-SIG mailing list