[Catalog-sig] PEP 345 Update
alexis at notmyidea.org
Tue Oct 5 03:26:17 CEST 2010
Sorry for this long silence; I'm now back on track.
Le 08/28/2010 04:27 AM, P.J. Eby a écrit :
> At 05:08 PM 8/27/2010 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> P.J. Eby wrote:
>> FWIW, I helped add those fields to PEP 345, in the context of making the
>> switch from "module / package"-centric values to distribution-centric
>> ones. The requirements came out of a sprint at PyCon 2009, with input
>> from both the Debian / Ubuntu Python packager (Matthias Klose) and one
>> of the Fedora packagers (Toshio Kuratomi).
> Great - could we get them to join in on this discussion to explain what
> it is that they want the creators of Python libraries to put in these
> fields, and what they intend to do with the information once it's there?
+1 on that. We need to have inputs on that: that's good to have fields,
but it's more important to know how they are supposed to be considered.
Any news about that ? Do someone have email adresses of Matthias Klose
and Toshio Kuratomi ?
Also, it's important to notice there is a difference between the new
field (release-conflict IIRC), and I assume it's important to have a
discussion about it know, and the others fields that are just being
renamed. (*-release fields). Maybe could we update the PEP a first time
about the renaming changes, in order to use them in the first version of
Distutils2, and them continue the discussion about the conflict field.
More information about the Catalog-SIG