[Catalog-sig] PyPI syndication format
tseaver at palladion.com
Mon Sep 13 20:16:01 CEST 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> I'm in favour of the issue reported originally be solved by skipping any
>> changes to the RSS altogether (leave the existing one for a time, of
>> course) and using Atom syndication, since AFAICT it provides all the
>> requirements discussed so far but in addition is properly specified and
> I don't think this ("all the requirements discussed so far") is actually
> the case. In the report, the reporter specifically asks for AppCast
> support, and elaborates that this is what
> says, which in turn says
> # Appcasting is the practice of using the 'enclosure' feature of RSS
> # 2.0 feeds
> So, by nature, Atom can't possibly support Appcasting.
> I also wonder why you keep saying that RSS is not properly specified.
Atom addresses a number of ambiguities in the RSS 2.0 spec. See:
In particular, handling markup (particularly HTML) as the content of
tags is underspecified in RSS 2.0.
> looks like a fine specification to me (but this really is a side issue;
> another is the use of the word "syndication": I don't know what it
> means, I then always think of organized crime and corruption - PyPI
> is not a member of any syndicate).
"Content syndication" is a fairly common term: it has pre-internet uses
for stuff like "syndicated columns" in newspapers. See:
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver at palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Catalog-SIG