[Catalog-sig] egg_info in PyPI

[P.J. Eby]

At 09:26 PM 9/20/2010 +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>That's how I would have implemented it. Alas, this very
>idea was just shot down.

Hm.  When the issue was adding comments to PyPI, you mostly ignored 
the strong opposition from people who didn't want to use the feature, 
in order to support those who did.

While I'm only +0 (at most) on adding egg_info, I'm not sure why the 
objections of people who won't be using the feature should carry more 
weight in the present discussion than in the previous one.  ;-)