[Catalog-sig] egg_info in PyPI

P.J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Mon Sep 20 23:20:17 CEST 2010

At 09:26 PM 9/20/2010 +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>That's how I would have implemented it. Alas, this very
>idea was just shot down.

Hm.  When the issue was adding comments to PyPI, you mostly ignored 
the strong opposition from people who didn't want to use the feature, 
in order to support those who did.

While I'm only +0 (at most) on adding egg_info, I'm not sure why the 
objections of people who won't be using the feature should carry more 
weight in the present discussion than in the previous one.  ;-)

More information about the Catalog-SIG mailing list