[Catalog-sig] "python 2 only" classifier
Chris McDonough
chrism at plope.com
Fri Dec 16 18:53:12 CET 2011
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 03:53 +0200, Yuval Greenfield wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Chris McDonough <chrism at plope.com>
> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 12:29 +0200, Yuval Greenfield wrote:
>
> > 1. If this forum likes it I'll add a lock icon next to
> packages with
> > the "Programming Language :: Python :: 2 :: Only" classifier
> with the
> > following mouse-over: "The maintainers of this code have
> declared it
> > will run on Python 2 only for the foreseeable future". This
> might
> > lessen the social pressure on the maintainers to port. I
> don't think
> > it'll help the PR issue.
>
>
> For the record, at least one package is already using the new
> "2-only"
> classifier now:
>
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Pylons/1.0.1rc1
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I added both features (python2only and py3equivalents). It took a lot
> longer than I expected and cost $0.10 of GAE quotas...
>
>
> Please do critique:
>
>
> http://python3wos.appspot.com/
Thanks for adding the feature. The way you've decided to do it, I guess
folks can't really opt out of the "shame of being red" by using a python
2 only tag. Also, given the composition of packages on there, that
chart will be all-red more or less forever; there's unlikely to be many
newly charting python 3-compat packages any time soon, at least none
that overtake the "will always be red" ones which have been around for 8
+ years. Lame.
- C
More information about the Catalog-SIG
mailing list