[Catalog-sig] "python 2 only" classifier
fuzzyman at gmail.com
Mon Dec 19 12:05:10 CET 2011
On 18 December 2011 23:09, Yuval Greenfield <ubershmekel at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Stefan Krah <stefan-usenet at bytereef.org>wrote:
>> Yuval Greenfield <ubershmekel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Stefan Krah <
>> stefan-usenet at bytereef.org>
>> > 1) ordereddict is part of:
>> > 2) pylint supports Python3 (from their README):
>> > 1) Fixed.
>> > 2) This is the same issue as with docutils. I believe that either a
>> > of PyPI needs to add the trove classifier for them or someone should
>> > Logilab and ask them to add the trove classifier.
>> The persons who are running PyPI should only edit individual pages in
>> exceptional situations (illegal content etc.).
>> I was under the impression that you want to to promote Python3 adoption.
>> Why don't you contact Logilab and check the rest of the packages manually?
> I'd already contacted several maintainers of packages with such a request.
> Starting this project I assumed PyPI would be a reliable source for this
> information, so I hope you can understand my mindset. I guess the WOS is
> also good for motivating package owners to fix their classifiers.
> On that note, I think PyPI should require python modules to declare which
> version they're compatible with or tested on.
The use of trove classifiers at all isn't compulsory on PyPI, so although I
agree it would be *preferable* for all authors to use them correctly I
don't think PyPI is going to require it any time soon.
>> If an author has decided to use the classifier, he already accepts
>> that his package might get less attention in the future. This isn't
>> an easy decision, so please respect the intent of the classifier and
>> remove such packages from your site.
> The WOS's main goal is to measure Python3 adoption in some non-trivial
> fashion. Total downloads isn't a perfect comparison as many downloads
> happened in the 8 years Python2 had a head start. Still, I don't know of a
> better metric. Removing packages that are a gigantic part of the python
> community would completely defeat the purpose of the site.
> If/when Richard implements the statistics call to PyPI, I might be able to
> implement more metrics.
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at gmail.com> wrote:
> some (additional) manual curation for packages that do support Python 3
>> will complete the job.
> Fine, fine, fine.... I added these cute little red triangles to the newly
> green docutils and pylint. Are there others I should know of?
Thank you, a great improvement.
All the best,
> Yuval Greenfield
> ps, some of you might prefer this limited edition better:
> Catalog-SIG mailing list
> Catalog-SIG at python.org
May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Catalog-SIG