[Catalog-sig] an immutable mirror of PyPI
P.J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Tue Jul 5 16:51:03 CEST 2011
At 04:18 PM 7/5/2011 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>That's why I asked
>whether PyPI is primarily a hosting site for developers (as opposed to
>something like Debian or Wikipedia which have notions about a
>collaborative effort of some kind, and care about preserving history).
It's right there in the name: Python Package *Index*. In other
words, it's an index of packages. Hosting the packages is
optional. Heck, a package actually having any *code* to download at
all is optional, since you can list a package you merely intend to
develop. Or you might just have a revision control link, etc.
So no, it's not a curated repository of code. If that were the case,
it'd be better named the Python Code Repository or some such.
The perspective that you have is influenced by your use case for
PyPI; by nature, these other sorts of packages (i.e. ones without
uploaded, released code) are ones you don't care about. But that
doesn't mean they don't exist.
In any case, you can't turn PyPI into PyCR by the simple expedient of
disallowing deletions; you'd need actual curators and a fresh website
that doesn't contain all the unreleased, unmaintained, un-existent,
or un-open-source packages found on PyPI.
More information about the Catalog-SIG
mailing list