[Catalog-sig] Thoughts on more detailed stats
ziade.tarek at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 11:58:34 CET 2011
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Jim Fulton <jim at zope.com> wrote:
> I don't know why downloading something as part of a buildout would be any
> different that doing a "pip install". I almost never download anything except
> with buildout.
Because when you are running a buildout to install a Plone, what you
are really doing is "installing Plone" -- downloading setuptools
within this process is just something the build tool does to work, and
does not necessarily means the final app uses it.
A fresh buildout call w/ the bootstrap script == one hit to
zc.buildout + one hit to setuptools
When you do an explicit "pip install XXX" you are installing XXX as an end-user.
>> Another way would be to ask Continuous Integration systems to use a
>> specific user agent marker.
>> In the UI we could then make the distinction in the download hits between:
>> 1/ downloads by the end users to install the project
>> 2/ downloads by build tools.
>> 3/ "indirect" downloads as dependencies
>> This is still a bit vague in my head, but I think it would be valuable
>> for people to have such details
> I think it would help to ask what the goals of the statistics are?
> The statistics are presumably used to answer some questions. What are
> those questions?
A/ is my project that provides end users script but also modules that
can be reused by other apps, is:
1/ being installed by end users explicitly via easy_install, pip or a
direct distutils install
2/ just pulled as a dependency for another project
B/ does the 126543265423 download hits I get for my project were done
by automated build scripts or for installations ?
C/ how can we differentiate the "end users" projects in PyPI, as
opposed to build tools like zc.buildout or setuptools
D/ Which projects are the ones my project is mostly downloaded for as
a dependency ?
> Jim Fulton
Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org
More information about the Catalog-SIG