[Catalog-sig] New classifiers for Plone

Alex Clark aclark at aclark.net
Fri Nov 18 17:33:11 CET 2011


Hi

On 11/18/11 11:17 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Alex Clark wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/18/11 8:23 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>> Alex Clark wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> There has been a discussion on distutils recently re: new trove classifiers for Plone. We have
>>>> settled on asking for the following new trove classifiers to be added:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      Framework :: Plone :: 3.3
>>>>      Framework :: Plone :: 4.0
>>>>      Framework :: Plone :: 4.1
>>>>      Framework :: Plone :: 4.2
>>>>      Framework :: Plone :: 4.3
>>>>
>>>> We will then encourage our add-on developers to use them in their add-ons, and implement new search
>>>> functionality on http://plone.org/products accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> Any objections? If not, please feel free to add these at your earliest convenience.
>>>
>>> You should also include:
>>>
>>> Framework :: Plone
>>> Framework :: Plone :: 3
>>> Framework :: Plone :: 4
>>>
>>> to make the set complete.
>>
>>
>> We actually don't want those, unless you want to use 4 instead of 4.0. Using 3 (or 3.0) does not
>> help us, as we don't intend to classify add-ons for releases prior to egg-based Plone releases
>> (starting at 3.2).
>
> Well, you don't, but users may want to browser PyPI and other similar
> indexes based on products for Plone, Plone 3 and Plone 4.
>
> The reasoning behind using major release classifiers is that package
> authors may now want to update the classifiers for their packages
> every time you issue a new release (by making a new release of the
> package).
>
> The unqualified category is needed for consistency with the other parent
> categories in the trove index.
>
>> We also discussed keeping the list as small as possible on the other thread.
>
> The above just follows the same schema as used for Python itself:
>
> Programming Language :: Python
> Programming Language :: Python :: 2
> Programming Language :: Python :: 2.3
> Programming Language :: Python :: 2.4
> Programming Language :: Python :: 2.5
> Programming Language :: Python :: 2.6
> Programming Language :: Python :: 2.7
> Programming Language :: Python :: 3
> Programming Language :: Python :: 3.0
> Programming Language :: Python :: 3.1
> Programming Language :: Python :: 3.2


OK I'm fine with this, then. So to reiterate, we are asking for (I 
forgot 3.2 in the previous list):

       Framework :: Plone :: 3
       Framework :: Plone :: 3.2
       Framework :: Plone :: 3.3
       Framework :: Plone :: 4
       Framework :: Plone :: 4.0
       Framework :: Plone :: 4.1
       Framework :: Plone :: 4.2
       Framework :: Plone :: 4.3


Alex



>




More information about the Catalog-SIG mailing list