[Catalog-sig] New classifiers for Plone
ziade.tarek at gmail.com
Fri Nov 18 21:08:19 CET 2011
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:05 PM, M.-A. Lemburg <mal at egenix.com> wrote:
> While custom classifiers would be nice, you'd also end up with
> inconsistencies, different naming for the same thing and lots
> of typos.
> Perhaps adding a limited form of such custom classifiers would
> work out at least for some parts of the tree:
> If a::b is in the index, then qualifiers using a::b as prefix
> would also be accepted, e.g. a::b::c and a::b::c::d.
> That way e.g. frameworks could start using subtrees that they manage
Sounds like a good idea to me. The only required change is in the PyPI
server software so it allows a custom part.
Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org
More information about the Catalog-SIG