[Catalog-sig] New classifiers for Plone
M.-A. Lemburg
mal at egenix.com
Sat Nov 19 00:14:24 CET 2011
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> You should also include:
>>
>> Framework :: Plone
>> Framework :: Plone :: 3
>> Framework :: Plone :: 4
>>
>> to make the set complete.
>
> I think I'll go by what the Plone community decides on. If they
> don't need these classifiers, they just don't need them. The fewer
> the better.
You probably missed Alex's reply:
Alex Clark wrote:
> OK I'm fine with this, then. So to reiterate, we are asking for (I forgot 3.2 in the previous list):
>
> Framework :: Plone :: 3
> Framework :: Plone :: 3.2
> Framework :: Plone :: 3.3
> Framework :: Plone :: 4
> Framework :: Plone :: 4.0
> Framework :: Plone :: 4.1
> Framework :: Plone :: 4.2
> Framework :: Plone :: 4.3
--
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com
Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Nov 19 2011)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________
::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::
eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
More information about the Catalog-SIG
mailing list