[Catalog-sig] New classifiers for Plone

M.-A. Lemburg mal at egenix.com
Sat Nov 19 00:14:24 CET 2011


"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> You should also include:
>>
>> Framework :: Plone
>> Framework :: Plone :: 3
>> Framework :: Plone :: 4
>>
>> to make the set complete.
> 
> I think I'll go by what the Plone community decides on. If they
> don't need these classifiers, they just don't need them. The fewer
> the better.

You probably missed Alex's reply:

Alex Clark wrote:
> OK I'm fine with this, then. So to reiterate, we are asking for (I forgot 3.2 in the previous list):
>
>       Framework :: Plone :: 3
>       Framework :: Plone :: 3.2
>       Framework :: Plone :: 3.3
>       Framework :: Plone :: 4
>       Framework :: Plone :: 4.0
>       Framework :: Plone :: 4.1
>       Framework :: Plone :: 4.2
>       Framework :: Plone :: 4.3

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Source  (#1, Nov 19 2011)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ...        http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ...             http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...        http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________

::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::


   eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH  Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
    D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
           Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
               http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/


More information about the Catalog-SIG mailing list