[Catalog-sig] Proposal: close the PyPI file-replacement loophole
djay at pretaweb.com
Thu Feb 2 03:59:29 CET 2012
It it counts I'm +1.
The problem with counting +1 or -1 is it assumes the silent majority
would be similarly split in opinion.
Technical Solutions Manager
PretaWeb: Multisite Performance Support
P: +612 80819071 | M: +61421477460 | twitter.com/djay75 | linkedin.com/
On 02/02/2012, at 12:36 PM, Richard Jones wrote:
> Summarising the responses:
> 8 at +1
> 3 at -1
> Several posts with no stated positions.
> Given it appears to be controversial, I'm just going to drop it. I
> just don't need the aggravation. PyPI can retain its ability to serve
> up potentially confusing file content.
> Catalog-SIG mailing list
> Catalog-SIG at python.org
More information about the Catalog-SIG