[Catalog-sig] Proposal: close the PyPI file-replacement loophole
fuzzyman at gmail.com
Tue Jan 31 23:53:48 CET 2012
On 29 January 2012 23:47, Richard Jones <r1chardj0n3s at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi catalog-sig,
> When we initially implemented file upload to PyPI it was our intention
> that the file be immutable once uploaded. The goal was to make things
> significantly simpler for end users - there would only ever be one
> file with a given name. If the content changed then so must the name
> (typically by creating a new release version.)
> After the upload facility was put in place we also added the ability
> to delete files uploaded to pypi. This created a loophole: if a
> package owner knew how to they could delete the file and re-upload,
> thus circumventing the replacement protection.
> I'm considering closing this loophole by retaining a record of the
> uploaded file (though not the contents) so that future uploads with
> the same name wouldn't be allowed. I understand that this is how the
> ruby gem archive handles deletion of files.
> Your thoughts?
FWIW I've occasionally found it useful to be able to delete uploads and
replace them, so I'm -1 on losing this capability.
All the best,
> Catalog-SIG mailing list
> Catalog-SIG at python.org
May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Catalog-SIG