[Catalog-sig] readthedocs.org or packages.python.org?

[Donald Stufft]

On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> 
> 
> On Feb 5, 2013, at 6:47 PM, Lennart Regebro <regebro at gmail.com (mailto:regebro at gmail.com)> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com (mailto:jnoller at gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > Read the docs is partially funded by the PSF. I'd happily increase that grant and support it even more. For most projects it has become the defacto location for sphinx based documentation.
> > > 
> > > I'm +100 on supporting it more, and heck, even making it the default
> > 
> > Packages.python.org (http://Packages.python.org) support any HTML, I think, right?
> > 
> > That said, is anyone using it without with Sphinx?
> > 
> > //Lennart
> 
> Afaik it does support arbitrary JS and HTML increasing the potential attack surface for XSS and JS poisoning attacks.
> _______________________________________________
> Catalog-SIG mailing list
> Catalog-SIG at python.org (mailto:Catalog-SIG at python.org)
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
> 
> 

I think it*only* supports static files, it just so happens sphinx produces some static files. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20130205/1d860623/attachment.html>