[Catalog-sig] Search engine relevance
donald at stufft.io
Fri Mar 8 16:28:06 CET 2013
On Mar 8, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> Yuval Greenfield <ubershmekel <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> No results found.
> Thanks for the answers.
> Yes, crate.io is at least missing pyst2 which does mention AGI in its
So it comes up when you search for "asterisk" https://crate.io/?q=asterisk&has_releases=on however that is less than optimal.
Basically the long_description isn't currently included in indexing for Crate because it trashed the search relevancy and I was unable to (with my limited experience in searches) come up with a method here that didn't trash the overall relevancy.
> (pyst2 is rather unmaintained, but that shouldn't matter a lot here :-))
> Catalog-SIG mailing list
> Catalog-SIG at python.org
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the Catalog-SIG