[CentralOH] Conda Versus Virtualenv
pybokeh at gmail.com
Sat Nov 22 18:34:25 CET 2014
I have been using conda/miniconda on Windows at work and virtualenv/pyvenv
at home on Linux machine.
But on my Linux machine, I have dropped pyvenv recently and just use
miniconda for now on.
It saves so much time from having to compile the source and the
has most of the packages I need. For packages it doesn't have, I can still
use pip to install them.
The only disadvantage I can think of using miniconda is maybe you have to
wait a week or two longer
to get the latest and greatest version of a package or when a new version
of Python comes out, you'll
have to wait even longer still. But that's minor IMO.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:39 PM, <jep200404 at columbus.rr.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:16:26 -0500, Eric Floehr <eric at intellovations.com>
> [> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:55:41 -0500, jep200404 at columbus.rr.com wrote:]
> > > What's best way to install ... _and_ virtualenv?
> > ... uses conda as the package and environment manager.
> What do you think of conda versus virtualenv?
> Would you drop (or have you dropped) virtualenv to use conda instead?
> CentralOH mailing list
> CentralOH at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CentralOH