[CentralOH] Feedback on a New Package
Erik Welch
erik.n.welch at gmail.com
Sat Dec 23 11:53:26 EST 2017
btw, the name clik is very close to another fairly well known and popular
CLI package click (from the creator of flask): http://click.pocoo.org/
Anyway, thanks for developing and sharing clik!
--Erik
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Joe Joyce <joe at decafjoe.com> wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> Thank you for the quick feedback! It's exactly the sort of thing I was
> looking for. I've been munching on it the last couple days, thoughts
> below.
>
> First -- duh. The instant I looked at the docs after reading your
> message, I saw exactly what you're talking about. The links under
> "Development" are documents about how to build/test/QA clik itself.
> But that is not *at all* clear! (Unless, err... you happened to have
> been the one who wrote that section like a month ago and haven't
> thought about it much since....)
>
> Second -- sigh. Quickstart/introductory documentation was/is a major
> struggle with clik.
>
> > how do I make a --help option or how do I get a filename name as the
> > first argument into a function that opens the file
>
> For a real-world program the answer is "just use argparse" -- clik
> provides nothing but an extra dependency to hassle with. clik doesn't
> really start to help out until/unless the program is more complex
> (namely: once it grows subcommands).
>
> So I've felt that, to make a compelling case for clik, the example
> code fundamentally has to be complex. That's why the tutorial is
> thirteen friggin' steps, and 52m in screencast form.
>
> But that's an unsatsifying answer. Expecting new users to make that
> kind of investment of time and mental energy on a first-pass
> evaluation is INSANE.
>
> I'm not totally sure what the answer is. But you're right, I need to
> bridge that gap.
>
> Also, there is a more specific answer to your example question.
> See below :).
>
> import sys
>
> from clik import app, args, parser
>
>
> def do_a_thing_with_a_filename(filename):
> pass
>
>
> @app
> def myapp():
> """
> This sentence and the next will be between the usage statement and
> the argument docs. If you're familiar with argparse, it's the
> ``description``.
>
> All the content after the first blank line is shown after the
> argument docs. In argparse terms, it's the ``epilog``. Note that
> argparse will reformat your documentation, so this is not
> a good place for things like examples that require formatting.
> """
>
> # Note: The -h/--help argument is automatically added by argparse.
> # clik provides the ``name`` (for the usage statement),
> # ``description`` and ``epilog`` to argparse. Description
> # and epilog are taken from the function docstring, as
> # described above. The ``name`` defaults to the function's
> # name, but can be overridden by calling the decorator as
> # follows: @app(name='other-name')
>
> parser.add_argument(
> '-f',
> '--filename',
> help='filename to pass to the function',
> )
>
> yield
>
> if args.filename is None:
> print('please provide a filename', file=sys.stderr)
> yield 1
>
> do_a_thing_with_a_filename(args.filename)
>
>
> if __name__ == '__main__':
> myapp.main()
>
>
> Thanks again for your feedback!
> Joe
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Thomas Winningham <winningham at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Very minor item from a quick look. The Quick start section seems to be
>> about building the project. While exceptionally complete content, I was
>> expecting something like a simplified version of the example code, say, how
>> do I make a --help option or how do I get a filename name as the first
>> argument into a function that opens the file.
>>
>> Otherwise, nicely done with having all the resources and such as the
>> documentation and the package submission all ready to go. Pretty clean and
>> clear!!
>>
>> On Dec 20, 2017 9:23 AM, "Joe Joyce" <joe at decafjoe.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all!
>>
>> Long time listener, first time caller. Love the show :P.
>>
>> So -- I built a thing. And if any of you have time over the holiday
>> break, I'd appreciate any feedback you have.
>>
>> The code / docs are in the usual places:
>>
>> https://github.com/decafjoe/clik
>> https://clik.readthedocs.io
>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/clik
>>
>> There are two "levels" of feedback I'm looking for.
>>
>> First, I've been in the forest so long on this thing that I'm not sure
>> whether the tutorial explains the concepts well, if at all. It all
>> makes sense to me, of course, but it's impossible for me to look at it
>> with a fresh set of eyes.
>>
>> So -- not considering whether the library itself sucks -- does the
>> tutorial explain things well? Is the pace appropriate? Too much detail
>> / too little?
>>
>> Second, any feedback on the library itself is welcome. This is the
>> first "real" thing I've released into the world, but I'll try not to
>> be too sensitive! I'm curious (and a honestly a little afraid) about
>> what y'all will think.
>>
>> Thanks, and happy holidays!
>> Joe
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentralOH mailing list
>> CentralOH at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/centraloh
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentralOH mailing list
>> CentralOH at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/centraloh
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentralOH mailing list
> CentralOH at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/centraloh
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/centraloh/attachments/20171223/d5e21e8e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the CentralOH
mailing list