[Chicago] code review tools

Brian Ray bray at sent.com
Tue Jul 24 18:34:58 CEST 2007

You might be talking a bit over my head-- admittedly, its easy to do  
sometimes.  I always thought Fagen type code reviews consist of  
anything but agile development. The tool of choice is a line printer,  
a conference room, and lots of coffee.

On Jul 24, 2007, at 11:14 AM, sheila miguez wrote:

> Has anyone seen papers with a two-factor analysis on it? varying the
> conditions of pair/non-pair and review/non-review.
> (or have anecodotal accounts?)


>> It would help if we could define the requirements of the code review
>> prior to recommending tools.
> Don't you guys do code reviews?

I actually encourage code review.  Although, deadlines always seem to  
get in the way. Our most detailed code reviews happen post- mortem.

Brian Ray
bray at sent.com

More information about the Chicago mailing list