[Chicago] ChiPy Needs your Help!
shekay at pobox.com
Mon Jan 5 20:57:25 CET 2009
I don't mind hearing your take on C.
I love the memory stuff. I felt pretty shaky when I moved to languages
that used garbage collection. It seems so wild and crazy.
and I loved being able to debug things by going directly to the memory
and looking at the results. I could see exactly how the memory was
allocated and what was dumped there.
and I could jump the program counter around.
it was a blast.
someone told me I have a case of the Mondays, sorry guys.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Daniel Griffin <dgriff1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a pretty interesting discussion by itself. What makes a language
> good? I guess i'm more interested in how a language will make my life
> This is pretty much why I wanted to do C. C is THE baseline language. In the
> current day its "kinda cross-platform assembly". So how hard is it to make
> a database driven app or maintain cross platform code? What kind
> typing/containers does the language provide? Can you use OO design or create
> functional code? What kind of issues does this language have?
> I dont think anyone will be blown away by C, but it will make an interesting
> comparison with other languages like Java or tcl and that's why I
> volunteered to show it. Also, most people nowadays dont learn about the
> magic of direct memory access and the amazing/terrible things you can do.
> If the consensus is to re-focus on dynamic/interpeted/scripting-ish
> languages i wont mind.
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Ian Bicking <ianb at colorstudy.com> wrote:
>> sheila miguez wrote:
>>> It's ambitious so it would be good to get a list. I thought we were
>>> going to focus on dynamic languages, but with c and java et al it
>>> might be too ambitious.
>>> For tcl I was hoping to hear about tclkits vs eggs since I hear that eggs
>> What's interesting would depend on the language, no? I only want to hear
>> about interesting stuff. If tclkits are interesting, I'd like to hear about
>> How about as a comparison point: how is the language interestingly better
>> than Python? As an example: "it's faster" might be a case of "better" but
>> it isn't really "interesting" (though maybe a short discussion of how type
>> declarations enable runtime optimizations might be interesting -- I just
>> don't think a laundry list of advantages is interesting).
>> For instance, if I talked about Logo I'd probably talk only about its
>> advantages as a teaching language. For Smalltalk there's the persistent
>> image, and how it breaks down the difference between code and objects.
>> Ian Bicking : ianb at colorstudy.com : http://blog.ianbicking.org
>> Chicago mailing list
>> Chicago at python.org
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
More information about the Chicago