[Chicago] who cares about meeting topics

[Eric Stein]

I attend based on the phase of the moon. Topics are a secondary
consideration.
Anything else is not relevant.

Eric

On 12/20/2011 11:17 PM, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> Meeting topics definitely mean a lot to me.  EG: last meeting when Tal
> was talking about GObject-introspect, I knew I was planning to be in
> town on Friday, but I knew I *had* to be in town for that particular
> talk.
>
> Carl Karsten <carl at personnelware.com> writes:
>
>> I am wondering how many people decide to attend or not based on what
>> talks are scheduled?
>>
>> For instance, I will attend even if something is scheduled that I am
>> sure I will  never use.  I always learn something, often in the
>> discussions between talks.
>>
>> Some times I will forward the announcement to friends that don't do
>> PYthon but are interested in the domain, like maps, robots, etc.
>>
>> I am assuming the same would apply to the Django group and wondering
>> if it is worth the trouble posting the planned talks or just the
>> time/place.   And this got me wondering the same thing about chipy
>> meetings.
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago