[Chicago] Business internet

[Trent Jurewicz]

+1 for suds.  I've used it on many projects (SOAP still, really?!?) and,
assuming your WSDL is well-formed and accurate, it is the best for creating
a Python client.

~T

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Ishmael Rufus <sakamura at gmail.com> wrote:

> >Do any of you have an ISP that your business is happy with?  I am looking
> in the range of 20mbps up/down, but would be amicable to faster, of course.
>
> We use AT&T at my workplace downtown for 20m down speeds. You would
> probably get a better return on your inquiry if you try the nanog mailing
> list.
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Vern Ceder <vceder at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Chad Glendenin <chad at glendenin.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:21 PM, JS Irick <hundredpercentjuice at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >     Second, more on topic q, does anyone have a preferred SOAP python
>>> client
>>> > library?
>>>
>>> I found it fairly easy to use the 'suds' module to access the Jira
>>> SOAP API. Admittedly, that was probably a year ago, so there might be
>>> something better now, but suds definitely worked.
>>>
>>
>> I've also used suds and found it worked pretty well.
>>
>> --
>> Vern Ceder
>> vceder at gmail.com, vceder at dogsinmotion.com
>> The Quick Python Book, 2nd Ed - http://bit.ly/bRsWDW
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago mailing list
>> Chicago at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/chicago/attachments/20120627/39f88f2e/attachment.html>