[Chicago] deployment shootout? was: deploying ...

Leon Chism leon at chism.org
Mon Dec 2 23:54:40 CET 2013


I'm afraid I'll have to bail on this as we are having a company event on
the 12th.


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Leon Chism <leon at chism.org> wrote:

> We use fabric for our deployments at Analyte Health. Maybe I can scare up
> someone to talk about how we use it.
>
> Leon
>
>
> On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Chris Sinchok <chris at sinchok.com> wrote:
>
> I'd be very interested in this. I've been making heavy use of ansible,
> fabric, and a lot of dev-opsy monitoring tools in our recent redesign, and
> I'd be more than happy to talk about some of that.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Nick Bennett <nick271828 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I would attend. I know enough about using Chef to never want to use it
>> again. I've been experimenting with Ansible and Fabric on my own time.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Carl Karsten <carl at personnelware.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I am thinking of a Chicago dev-ops meeting that will be like the
>>> language shootout, only for deployment tools.  If I can get 5 people
>>> to say they might attend and one that says they might present, I might
>>> go ahead with this.  so not looking for commitment, just interest.
>>>
>>>   I don't have a date, I need to talk to the devops group leader, and
>>> I don't even know who that is, but I want to make sure someone would
>>> bother showing up before I put any more effort into it.
>>>
>>> fabric, chef, puppet, salt, ansible (just heard about it yesterday)
>>> glu?
>>> am i missing any?
>>> if someone wants to do bash... sure. we need comic relief.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:12 PM, sheila miguez <shekay at pobox.com> wrote:
>>> > This swaying me towards fabric for a first attempt at automating the
>>> setup.
>>> > I don't know that I'll get to this step this week because it depends
>>> on how
>>> > priorities go at work (the deployment stuff is "invisible" work).
>>> >
>>> > Then maybe I can ask for some code review at python office hours.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Steven McGrath <steve at cugnet.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> fabric++
>>> >>
>>> >> I actually use fabric for most deployment and management stuff.  One
>>> of my
>>> >> prod backup scripts is leveraging fabric for pulling everything
>>> together.
>>> >>
>>> >> —
>>> >> Steven McGrath
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On November 20, 2013 at 12:05:15 PM, Daniel Fehrenbach
>>> >> (dnfehrenbach at gmail.com) wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I've stared using Fabric for deploying stuff at work. I only have 1
>>> server
>>> >> (with a similar stack to Sheila's) where everything lives so I am not
>>> >> dealing with a lot of different hosts or very rapid deployment time
>>> tables.
>>> >> Personally, I found that it was easier to go from my standard text
>>> file of
>>> >> copy/pasted lines of terminal inputs to a fabfile than to a
>>> >> chef/salt/ansible framework but I was never able to devote much time
>>> to
>>> >> learning the higher caliber tools.
>>> >>
>>> >> Dan
>>> >>
>>> > [...]
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > sheila
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Chicago mailing list
>>> > Chicago at python.org
>>> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Carl K
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chicago mailing list
>>> Chicago at python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago mailing list
>> Chicago at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/chicago/attachments/20131202/c0f4847d/attachment.html>


More information about the Chicago mailing list