[Chicago] pydoc -p 6060

[Brian Herman]

Would a way to support python 2.7 be to create a python egg for it and
allow users to install it with easy_install or pip?


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Brian Curtin <brian at python.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Joe Germuska <joe at germuska.com> wrote:
> > On Jul 21, 2013, at 8:57 PM, Feihong Hsu <feihong.hsu at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Wow, this is really useful. Thanks!
> >
> > Wish the styling wasn't so ugly though.
> >
> >
> > So, given that Python is open source and all, my thought was "hey, can
> that
> > be fixed?"
> >
> > I honestly am not all that likely to fix it, but I did hunt around a
> little
> > and I realized my ignorance about the overall development process for the
> > Python language. And, I figured there are lots of ChiPy folks who could
> > enlighten me, so:
> >
> > Is this the "official" repository to which one would submit changes?
> > http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/2.7/Lib/pydoc.py
>
> http://docs.python.org/devguide/ goes over the processes, and yep,
> you're looking at the right repo.
>
> However, since any change to the styling would be a new feature rather
> than a bug fix, the change would be to the "default" branch in the
> repo (the in-progress head of the project, to become 3.4), not on 2.7.
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>



-- 


Thanks,
Brian Herman
college.nfshost.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/chicago/attachments/20130722/e1e41154/attachment.html>