[Chicago] Can I see a +1 on this?

[Yarko Tymciurak]

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Cezar Jenkins <emperorcezar at gmail.com>wrote:

> While I like the feature, has there ever been a time when we have denied a
> talk?
>

"Hey, I'd like to talk about the white squirrels of Olney, IL"  - there!
 :-D


>
> --
> Cezar Jenkins
> @emperorcezar
> ------------------------------
> From: JP Bader JP Bader <jp at zavteq.com>
> Reply: The Chicago Python Users Group chicago at python.org
> Date: January 30, 2014 at 8:29:07 PM
> To: The Chicago Python Users Group chicago at python.org
> Subject:  Re: [Chicago] Can I see a +1 on this?
>
> What are the problems with Brian C's proposal? It is relatively quick and
> efficient, just propose ideas to the site, those that get voted on
> (generally at least 1 +1 would get a talk) and that's relatively
> straightforward. I mean, I guess there might be some people who might rig
> up a bot to auto-boost their ratings (like some have been known to do for
> karma), but our group is above that, right?
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Yarko Tymciurak <yarkot1 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Gee, Brian C. --- I thought a pre-meeting meeting at a pub, and everyone
>> lifts their glass to the talk they want to hear would be more face-time
>> social than email;  click-a-site seem in the other direction (efficient,
>> disconnected at the human level, maybe not the data level) ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Brian Ray <brianhray at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There is a website for feature requests on the website:
>>> https://github.com/chicagopython/chipy.org/issues
>>>
>>> There are some problems with your proposal, Brian C; however, we can
>>> discuss that there :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, January 30, 2014, Brian Curtin <brian at python.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:31 PM, sheila miguez <shekay at pobox.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Brian Curtin <brian at python.org>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can this be a part of the website or voted on in some other way? I
>>>>>> really hope having people submitting empty "+1" emails over and over is not
>>>>>> actually the plan for coming up with the schedule.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I could set up a symposion instance for chipy. People would need to
>>>>> create accounts to vote.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't even need to be that - there's already a website. I doubt
>>>> anyone is going to game the system to win votes for a ChiPy talk - could be
>>>> as simple as just having a +1 button next to a proposal.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Brian Ray
>>> @brianray
>>> (773) 669-7717
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chicago mailing list
>>> Chicago at python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago mailing list
>> Chicago at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> JP Bader
> Principal
> Zavteq, Inc.
> @lordB8r | jp at zavteq.com
> 608.692.2468
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/chicago/attachments/20140131/290d4cef/attachment.html>