[Chicago] Can I see a +1 on this?

[Yarko Tymciurak]

(fully tongue in cheek here):
so if "+1" constitute mail noise, do ":-)" also?   :-D


On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jason Wirth <wirth.jason at gmail.com> wrote:

> Both Brians make good points.
>
> I agree an empty +1 email could be noisy.
>
> One point about the email feedback, I think in the case of new presenters
> the act of speaking can be intimidating because there are many possible
> things to talk about and the speaker doesn't know what the group wants.
> Thus there's a tendency to be very "open" and talk about anything. A shot
> in the dark if you will. Email responses from the group can help narrow
> the focus. But then again emails that do this are not empty "+1" emails.
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 31, 2014, Japhy Bartlett <japhy at pearachute.com> wrote:
>
>> Could we get a +1 on using +1 to vote for talks?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Brian Curtin <brian at python.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Brian Ray <brianhray at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I also want to be sensitive to noise on this list; however, I am not
>>>> convinced +1 is noise.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Numerous emails which only contain "+1" is the definition of email noise.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chicago mailing list
>>> Chicago at python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> --
> Jason Wirth
>     213.675.5294
>     wirth.jason at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/chicago/attachments/20140131/2b1f9c98/attachment.html>