[Chicago] Applause meter used for judging the talks tonight

Adam Forsyth adam at adamforsyth.net
Fri May 15 16:28:29 CEST 2015


The winner was ahead by enough I don't think the voting method would have
made a difference. Second and third were very close, so it's possible that
would have turned out a different way. I did my best by walking the length
of the room during each sampling period.
On May 15, 2015 08:28, "Randy Baxley" <randy7771026 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Wondering if two exact systems place at different locations would produce
> different results and if so what array of sensors would work best.
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Adam Forsyth <adam at adamforsyth.net>
> wrote:
>
>> https://gist.github.com/agfor/8f71b25c798957c47b0a
>>
>> Exactly as I wrote it during the event, except with '\n' added so it
>> splits correctly. Please don't think this is how code I normally write
>> looks :)
>>
>> I first tried pyaudio on both osx and Ubuntu in a vm, but it didn't work,
>> so I switched to alsaaudio on the Linux vm. I based the script on the one
>> at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=500337
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago mailing list
>> Chicago at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/chicago/attachments/20150515/988d513b/attachment.html>


More information about the Chicago mailing list