From buck at yelp.com Mon Oct 21 20:14:39 2013 From: buck at yelp.com (Buck Golemon) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:14:39 -0700 Subject: [code-quality] inference stack overflow Message-ID: Can any of you all give me your triage analysis of this issue? https://bitbucket.org/logilab/astroid/issue/7/very-long-run-time-and-or-stack-overflow --- Three less-important questions regarding pylint support. I've tried to discuss this issue several times on #pylint, to no avail. Is that IRC channel actually functional? I've tried to notify the ops that a logging bot has joined the channel, but I don't believe the message was received ( http://irclogs.jackgrigg.com/irc.freenode.net/pylint/2013-10-18). The pylint website gives python-projects at lists.logilab.org as the mailing list, but the README gives code-quality at python.org. Is one of these wrong? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From graffatcolmingov at gmail.com Wed Oct 23 04:13:51 2013 From: graffatcolmingov at gmail.com (Ian Cordasco) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:13:51 -0500 Subject: [code-quality] inference stack overflow In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Buck Golemon wrote: > Can any of you all give me your triage analysis of this issue? > https://bitbucket.org/logilab/astroid/issue/7/very-long-run-time-and-or-stack-overflow I have no opinion about triaging that. > --- > Three less-important questions regarding pylint support. > > I've tried to discuss this issue several times on #pylint, to no avail. > Is that IRC channel actually functional? I don't personally know. > I've tried to notify the ops that a logging bot has joined the channel, but > I don't believe the message was received > (http://irclogs.jackgrigg.com/irc.freenode.net/pylint/2013-10-18). Generally, if I were the channel owner, I wouldn't appreciate anyone inviting a bot to log my channel. That said, I'm not the channel owner so they may be fine with it. Still seems kind of bold to do arbitrarily and without having any ability to tell others they're being logged, especially when it's Freenode's policy that all users be notified. > The pylint website gives python-projects at lists.logilab.org as the mailing > list, but the README gives code-quality at python.org. Is one of these wrong? I believe when I launched this list with Florent and Tarek that PyLint said they were merging their list into this one. The website is sadily probably out-of-date. Thanks for bringing this up since I'm sure it will serve as a reminder to someone who can take care of this. From sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr Wed Oct 23 08:12:02 2013 From: sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr (Sylvain =?utf-8?B?VGjDqW5hdWx0?=) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:12:02 +0200 Subject: [code-quality] inference stack overflow In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20131023061201.GB2541@logilab.fr> On 22 octobre 21:13, Ian Cordasco wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Buck Golemon wrote: > > Can any of you all give me your triage analysis of this issue? > > https://bitbucket.org/logilab/astroid/issue/7/very-long-run-time-and-or-stack-overflow > I have no opinion about triaging that. This sounds like a valid issue that should be investigated. > > --- > > Three less-important questions regarding pylint support. > > > > I've tried to discuss this issue several times on #pylint, to no avail. > > Is that IRC channel actually functional? > > I've tried to notify the ops that a logging bot has joined the channel, but > > I don't believe the message was received > > (http://irclogs.jackgrigg.com/irc.freenode.net/pylint/2013-10-18). > > Generally, if I were the channel owner, I wouldn't appreciate anyone > inviting a bot to log my channel. That said, I'm not the channel owner > so they may be fine with it. Still seems kind of bold to do > arbitrarily and without having any ability to tell others they're > being logged, especially when it's Freenode's policy that all users be > notified. pylint irc channel is unofficial and there is no guarantee of any maintainers being available there for now. I personnaly prefer more asynchronous way of communication such as email, but you can still use the mentionned jabber forum. I'll update the web site about that. > > The pylint website gives python-projects at lists.logilab.org as the mailing > > list, but the README gives code-quality at python.org. Is one of these wrong? > > I believe when I launched this list with Florent and Tarek that PyLint > said they were merging their list into this one. The website is sadily > probably out-of-date. Thanks for bringing this up since I'm sure it > will serve as a reminder to someone who can take care of this. Right. http://docs.pylint.org/contribute.html#mailing-lists properly refers to code-quality. Fixing www.pylint.org, as I guess that's the place you've found this misleading information. -- Sylvain Th?nault, LOGILAB, Paris (01.45.32.03.12) - Toulouse (05.62.17.16.42) Formations Python, Debian, M?th. Agiles: http://www.logilab.fr/formations D?veloppement logiciel sur mesure: http://www.logilab.fr/services CubicWeb, the semantic web framework: http://www.cubicweb.org From julien.cristau at logilab.fr Wed Oct 23 10:24:20 2013 From: julien.cristau at logilab.fr (Julien Cristau) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:24:20 +0200 Subject: [code-quality] inference stack overflow In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20131023082420.GB8723@crater1.logilab.fr> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:14:39 -0700, Buck Golemon wrote: > I've tried to discuss this issue several times on #pylint, to no avail. > Is that IRC channel actually functional? > It is, but I for one don't usually watch it on the week-ends or in the middle of the night. Cheers, Julien -- Julien Cristau Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/ Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances