From mhamilt at sandia.gov  Thu Sep  4 01:25:55 2014
From: mhamilt at sandia.gov (Mark E. Hamilton)
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:25:55 -0600
Subject: [code-quality] [EXTERNAL] Re: Pylint not reporting modules
 passed on command line
In-Reply-To: <20140825120102.GB4864@logilab.fr>
References: <53E533A8.1000108@sandia.gov> <20140825120102.GB4864@logilab.fr>
Message-ID: <5407A383.3010000@sandia.gov>

Sylvain,

On 08/25/14 06:01, Sylvain Th?nault wrote:
> On 08 ao?t 14:31, Mark E. Hamilton wrote:
>> blah, blah, blah
>>
>
> This is a bug that should be reported on
> https://bitbucket.org/logilab/pylint/issues

Thank you. It have reported it on bitbucket. After some additional 
testing it looks like the reason test1 was not reported was that it only 
had convention violations, whereas test2 had warnings.

-- 
----------------
Mark E. Hamilton
Engineering Sciences Center
Senior Member of Technical Staff
Sandia National Laboratories
505-844-7666

From oliver at bestwalter.de  Wed Sep  3 14:53:01 2014
From: oliver at bestwalter.de (Oliver Bestwalter)
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:53:01 +0200
Subject: [code-quality] How and where to add tests for Python 3
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Kwu2YdvxD_me0a62W4VYk3-N3iNg9MX65xFJRPYN57h-30w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <53FA4611.9070605@etu.enseeiht.fr>
 <CAN-Kwu08-doYO_7c_i1j5VE-k-oNyLJ2Be0YTAUx8i99=uG6KQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <53FAF58B.8070903@etu.enseeiht.fr>
 <CAN-Kwu2XBRGRFOEEVCbJKQN+bF48R8n7DjFSsczF6H9t16-DLA@mail.gmail.com>
 <53FB5732.7000308@etu.enseeiht.fr>
 <CAN-Kwu1aTNyLqGjp2xmOCatp-Ee_MJjvjpo-cTt_gohF61pR2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <53FD93B0.1000900@etu.enseeiht.fr>
 <CAN-Kwu2YdvxD_me0a62W4VYk3-N3iNg9MX65xFJRPYN57h-30w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAG5CgtpW_LT+HeKERgkrNaS4n7b+wOAz9nh+4BvkJgkiYmMYrA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

first post here as well. I started lurking here a while ago because I am
interested in static code analysis (atm strictly from a consumer perspecive
though).

On 28 August 2014 01:16, Ian Cordasco <graffatcolmingov at gmail.com> wrote:

> > $ flake8 --version
> > 2.2.3 (pep8: 1.5.7, pyflakes: 0.8.1, mccabe: 0.2.1) CPython 3.4.1 on
> Linux
> >
> > And the code to test:
> >
> > import string
> >
> > print(string.letters)
>

I'd like to add some pointers to other projects that might be better at
solving problems like this.

1. I use PyCharm and it it has the best static code analysis I came across
yet. It highlights errors like this ans is very clever with dynamically
loaded imports as well (by collecting and caching runtime data as well).
They have an open source community edition as well:
http://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/features/editions_comparison_matrix.html

1. Another interesting project is Jedi: https://github.com/davidhalter/jedi
that started of as autocompletion lib, but is now moving towards static
code analysis as well (and Dave is a nice guy as well :)).

Cheers
Oliver
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/code-quality/attachments/20140903/f9daddd0/attachment.html>

From mhamilt at sandia.gov  Fri Sep  5 02:05:40 2014
From: mhamilt at sandia.gov (Mark E. Hamilton)
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:05:40 -0600
Subject: [code-quality] Putting files (html and text) in an alternate
	directory
Message-ID: <5408FE54.4060701@sandia.gov>

Is there a way to tell pylint to write the html or text files it 
generates in a directory other than the current directory? I want to be 
able to put the file in a web-accessible directory, while testing a set 
of code which is not in that location.

-- 
----------------
Mark E. Hamilton
Engineering Sciences Center
Senior Member of Technical Staff
Sandia National Laboratories
505-844-7666

From sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr  Fri Sep  5 13:31:04 2014
From: sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr (Sylvain =?utf-8?B?VGjDqW5hdWx0?=)
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:31:04 +0200
Subject: [code-quality] dedicated pylint dev mailing list
Message-ID: <20140905113104.GB2771@logilab.fr>

Hi there,

as you probably know, we recently moved discussion about pylint to this mailing
list. As this is not very suitable channel for coordination among pylint
developpers, we decided to create a dedicated channel for this topic. If you are
interested, please subscribe
to?http://lists.logilab.org/mailman/admindb/pylint-dev

More general topics and user related questions should be kept here.

-- 
Sylvain Th?nault, LOGILAB, Paris (01.45.32.03.12) - Toulouse (05.62.17.16.42)
Formations Python, Debian, M?th. Agiles: http://www.logilab.fr/formations
D?veloppement logiciel sur mesure:       http://www.logilab.fr/services
CubicWeb, the semantic web framework:    http://www.cubicweb.org

From sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr  Fri Sep  5 14:02:27 2014
From: sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr (Sylvain =?utf-8?B?VGjDqW5hdWx0?=)
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:02:27 +0200
Subject: [code-quality] dedicated pylint dev mailing list
In-Reply-To: <20140905113104.GB2771@logilab.fr>
References: <20140905113104.GB2771@logilab.fr>
Message-ID: <20140905120227.GE2771@logilab.fr>

On 05 septembre 13:31, Sylvain Th?nault wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> as you probably know, we recently moved discussion about pylint to this mailing
> list. As this is not very suitable channel for coordination among pylint
> developpers, we decided to create a dedicated channel for this topic. If you are
> interested, please subscribe
> to?http://lists.logilab.org/mailman/admindb/pylint-dev

link should be http://lists.logilab.org/mailman/listinfo/pylint-dev

-- 
Sylvain Th?nault, LOGILAB, Paris (01.45.32.03.12) - Toulouse (05.62.17.16.42)
Formations Python, Debian, M?th. Agiles: http://www.logilab.fr/formations
D?veloppement logiciel sur mesure:       http://www.logilab.fr/services
CubicWeb, the semantic web framework:    http://www.cubicweb.org

From sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr  Fri Sep  5 14:03:53 2014
From: sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr (Sylvain =?utf-8?B?VGjDqW5hdWx0?=)
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:03:53 +0200
Subject: [code-quality] Putting files (html and text) in an alternate
 directory
In-Reply-To: <5408FE54.4060701@sandia.gov>
References: <5408FE54.4060701@sandia.gov>
Message-ID: <20140905120353.GF2771@logilab.fr>

On 04 septembre 18:05, Mark E. Hamilton wrote:
> Is there a way to tell pylint to write the html or text files it
> generates in a directory other than the current directory? I want to
> be able to put the file in a web-accessible directory, while testing
> a set of code which is not in that location.

nop, there is no such option.
-- 
Sylvain Th?nault, LOGILAB, Paris (01.45.32.03.12) - Toulouse (05.62.17.16.42)
Formations Python, Debian, M?th. Agiles: http://www.logilab.fr/formations
D?veloppement logiciel sur mesure:       http://www.logilab.fr/services
CubicWeb, the semantic web framework:    http://www.cubicweb.org

From graffatcolmingov at gmail.com  Fri Sep 12 01:40:30 2014
From: graffatcolmingov at gmail.com (Ian Cordasco)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:40:30 -0500
Subject: [code-quality] Request For Comments: Moving Flake8 development to
	Git
Message-ID: <CAN-Kwu2gKTnTCOLUX-6J2r7sRCbeyEGkaiHgzt=BDocSqmxJLQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hey all,

Since the beginning Flake8 has been developed entirely in mercurial.
There's been some push back lately about it not being available in
git. For a time there, Bruno maintained a git mirror on which we
accepted pull requests, but neither of us had the time to maintain it
after a while. Given the popularity of git, it seems reasonable to
move the development. There are tools to preserve the repository
history so nothing will be lost.

What does the code-quality community think?

Cheers,
Ian

From tarek at ziade.org  Fri Sep 12 07:19:38 2014
From: tarek at ziade.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tarek_Ziad=E9?=)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:19:38 +0200
Subject: [code-quality] Request For Comments: Moving Flake8 development
 to Git
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Kwu2gKTnTCOLUX-6J2r7sRCbeyEGkaiHgzt=BDocSqmxJLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN-Kwu2gKTnTCOLUX-6J2r7sRCbeyEGkaiHgzt=BDocSqmxJLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5412826A.9070804@ziade.org>

Le 12/09/14 01:40, Ian Cordasco a ?crit :
> Hey all,
>
> Since the beginning Flake8 has been developed entirely in mercurial.
> There's been some push back lately about it not being available in
> git. For a time there, Bruno maintained a git mirror on which we
> accepted pull requests, but neither of us had the time to maintain it
> after a while. Given the popularity of git, it seems reasonable to
> move the development. There are tools to preserve the repository
> history so nothing will be lost.
>
> What does the code-quality community think?
sounds good to me
>
> Cheers,
> Ian
> _______________________________________________
> code-quality mailing list
> code-quality at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality


From carl.crowder at gmail.com  Fri Sep 12 08:18:10 2014
From: carl.crowder at gmail.com (Carl Crowder)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 08:18:10 +0200
Subject: [code-quality] Request For Comments: Moving Flake8 development
	to Git
In-Reply-To: <5412826A.9070804@ziade.org>
References: <CAN-Kwu2gKTnTCOLUX-6J2r7sRCbeyEGkaiHgzt=BDocSqmxJLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5412826A.9070804@ziade.org>
Message-ID: <CAK2BMQsRmPYskJPxp=u3ckySM93wTeMBkQa3FmPswVey_Ckmyg@mail.gmail.com>

I think it's a good idea. I personally dislike contributing to
hg-based projects because it's such a faff for me compared to using
git, and I wouldn't be surprised if others are put off contributing
for a similar reason (not that I'm saying the reason is good, I'm just
lazy!)

From sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr  Fri Sep 12 08:38:38 2014
From: sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr (Sylvain =?utf-8?B?VGjDqW5hdWx0?=)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 08:38:38 +0200
Subject: [code-quality] Request For Comments: Moving Flake8 development
 to Git
In-Reply-To: <CAK2BMQsRmPYskJPxp=u3ckySM93wTeMBkQa3FmPswVey_Ckmyg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN-Kwu2gKTnTCOLUX-6J2r7sRCbeyEGkaiHgzt=BDocSqmxJLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5412826A.9070804@ziade.org>
 <CAK2BMQsRmPYskJPxp=u3ckySM93wTeMBkQa3FmPswVey_Ckmyg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20140912063838.GF2854@logilab.fr>

On 12 septembre 08:18, Carl Crowder wrote:
> I think it's a good idea. I personally dislike contributing to
> hg-based projects because it's such a faff for me compared to using
> git, and I wouldn't be surprised if others are put off contributing
> for a similar reason (not that I'm saying the reason is good, I'm just
> lazy!)

Isn't this rather a question of platform - github vs bitbucket ?

On the command line tool side, I personnaly feel like mercurial is easier for
newcomers. On the other hand, for power user, the hg+evolve workflow is very
powerful. Ok, I'm biased since I know more about hg than git ;)

-- 
Sylvain Th?nault, LOGILAB, Paris (01.45.32.03.12) - Toulouse (05.62.17.16.42)
Formations Python, Debian, M?th. Agiles: http://www.logilab.fr/formations
D?veloppement logiciel sur mesure:       http://www.logilab.fr/services
CubicWeb, the semantic web framework:    http://www.cubicweb.org

From graffatcolmingov at gmail.com  Fri Sep 12 14:35:44 2014
From: graffatcolmingov at gmail.com (Ian Cordasco)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:35:44 -0500
Subject: [code-quality] Request For Comments: Moving Flake8 development
	to Git
In-Reply-To: <20140912063838.GF2854@logilab.fr>
References: <CAN-Kwu2gKTnTCOLUX-6J2r7sRCbeyEGkaiHgzt=BDocSqmxJLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5412826A.9070804@ziade.org>
 <CAK2BMQsRmPYskJPxp=u3ckySM93wTeMBkQa3FmPswVey_Ckmyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140912063838.GF2854@logilab.fr>
Message-ID: <CAN-Kwu3EMqE8xoYYww2JJm_hO5FicfJbEgyNAXiTiH0+Jw3WLg@mail.gmail.com>

I was actually wondering if we should just keep it on BitBucket but convert
it to git. This would allow the URL to remain the same so people will not
be misled to the old repository. Granted clicking a link to take them to
the git version isn't terrible but it just seems easier. Also while I'm the
most active maintainer I wouldn't feel right recreating the repo under my
account. If we do move to GitHub, I would rather make an organization to
house the repo and probably flake8-docstrings.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/code-quality/attachments/20140912/b3e98fd4/attachment.html>

From skip at pobox.com  Fri Sep 12 14:47:24 2014
From: skip at pobox.com (Skip Montanaro)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:47:24 -0500
Subject: [code-quality] Request For Comments: Moving Flake8 development
	to Git
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Kwu3EMqE8xoYYww2JJm_hO5FicfJbEgyNAXiTiH0+Jw3WLg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN-Kwu2gKTnTCOLUX-6J2r7sRCbeyEGkaiHgzt=BDocSqmxJLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5412826A.9070804@ziade.org>
 <CAK2BMQsRmPYskJPxp=u3ckySM93wTeMBkQa3FmPswVey_Ckmyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140912063838.GF2854@logilab.fr>
 <CAN-Kwu3EMqE8xoYYww2JJm_hO5FicfJbEgyNAXiTiH0+Jw3WLg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANc-5Ux1f37NdR0hsfx50jMEtjsoB=AXuo3J_Fa0_+iCMU+y0w@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Ian Cordasco
<graffatcolmingov at gmail.com> wrote:
> I was actually wondering if we should just keep it on BitBucket but convert
> it to git. This would allow the URL to remain the same so people will not be
> misled to the old repository.

I had exactly this problem with pylockfile. Both for finding the repo,
and the distributions. If you're happy enough with BitBucket and it
supports git, that is the path I would choose.

Skip

From tarek at ziade.org  Fri Sep 12 14:51:50 2014
From: tarek at ziade.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tarek_Ziad=E9?=)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:51:50 +0200
Subject: [code-quality] Request For Comments: Moving Flake8 development
 to Git
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Kwu3EMqE8xoYYww2JJm_hO5FicfJbEgyNAXiTiH0+Jw3WLg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN-Kwu2gKTnTCOLUX-6J2r7sRCbeyEGkaiHgzt=BDocSqmxJLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5412826A.9070804@ziade.org>
 <CAK2BMQsRmPYskJPxp=u3ckySM93wTeMBkQa3FmPswVey_Ckmyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140912063838.GF2854@logilab.fr>
 <CAN-Kwu3EMqE8xoYYww2JJm_hO5FicfJbEgyNAXiTiH0+Jw3WLg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5412EC66.6040202@ziade.org>

Le 12/09/14 14:35, Ian Cordasco a ?crit :
>
> I was actually wondering if we should just keep it on BitBucket but
> convert it to git. This would allow the URL to remain the same so
> people will not be misled to the old repository. Granted clicking a
> link to take them to the git version isn't terrible but it just seems
> easier. Also while I'm the most active maintainer I wouldn't feel
> right recreating the repo under my account. If we do move to GitHub, I
> would rather make an organization to house the repo and probably
> flake8-docstrings.
>
Some kind of QA org seems like a good move. I can always archive my BB
repo and keep a single README that points to the new stuff.




>
>
> _______________________________________________
> code-quality mailing list
> code-quality at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/code-quality/attachments/20140912/bdc9cbf9/attachment.html>

From graffatcolmingov at gmail.com  Fri Sep 12 15:00:54 2014
From: graffatcolmingov at gmail.com (Ian Cordasco)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 08:00:54 -0500
Subject: [code-quality] Request For Comments: Moving Flake8 development
	to Git
In-Reply-To: <CANc-5Ux1f37NdR0hsfx50jMEtjsoB=AXuo3J_Fa0_+iCMU+y0w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN-Kwu2gKTnTCOLUX-6J2r7sRCbeyEGkaiHgzt=BDocSqmxJLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5412826A.9070804@ziade.org>
 <CAK2BMQsRmPYskJPxp=u3ckySM93wTeMBkQa3FmPswVey_Ckmyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140912063838.GF2854@logilab.fr>
 <CAN-Kwu3EMqE8xoYYww2JJm_hO5FicfJbEgyNAXiTiH0+Jw3WLg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANc-5Ux1f37NdR0hsfx50jMEtjsoB=AXuo3J_Fa0_+iCMU+y0w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAN-Kwu2OWS0C1uB4PYksET9rXFR1GSbad111TKTwYue96Q_Pdg@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/12/14, Skip Montanaro <skip at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Ian Cordasco
> <graffatcolmingov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was actually wondering if we should just keep it on BitBucket but
>> convert
>> it to git. This would allow the URL to remain the same so people will not
>> be
>> misled to the old repository.
>
> I had exactly this problem with pylockfile. Both for finding the repo,
> and the distributions. If you're happy enough with BitBucket and it
> supports git, that is the path I would choose.
>
> Skip
>

Yeah, BitBucket does support it. While I'm not exactly a fan of
BitBucket, it might be best to just continue hosting the repository
for this reason. flake8 has been there for 3 (or more) years now and
that's where people likely expect it to be. I consider this more-so to
be Tarek's decision though and in light of his latest email I created
the PyCQA org on GitHub to have something to host it under. It's in
the tradition of PyCA and PyPA (Python Cryptographic and Packaging
Authorities), but it can be renamed before we add any repos to it
since it can sound rather presumptuous to some (even though it's
mostly in jest).

From skip at pobox.com  Fri Sep 12 17:52:15 2014
From: skip at pobox.com (Skip Montanaro)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:52:15 -0500
Subject: [code-quality] pylint for cython?
Message-ID: <CANc-5UzRE3dscU4KDF-DUxiSq3h5_Zg1e7Rf_RXnU_bOM0b8ew@mail.gmail.com>

I have slowly been converting some Python source to Cython. I'm pretty
conservative in what changes I make, mostly sprinkling a few "cdef",
"float" and "int" declarations around the pyx file. Still, conservative or
not, it's enough to choke pylint. Rather than have to maintain a pure
Python version of my code, it would be nice if pylint had a flag or if
there was a "cylint" tool available.

A few Google and PyPi searches failed to reveal anything. Is there
something out there?

Thanks,

Skip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/code-quality/attachments/20140912/dc780bb7/attachment.html>

From mmueller at python-academy.de  Fri Sep 12 19:25:19 2014
From: mmueller at python-academy.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mike_M=FCller?=)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:25:19 +0200
Subject: [code-quality] pylint for cython?
In-Reply-To: <CANc-5UzRE3dscU4KDF-DUxiSq3h5_Zg1e7Rf_RXnU_bOM0b8ew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANc-5UzRE3dscU4KDF-DUxiSq3h5_Zg1e7Rf_RXnU_bOM0b8ew@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <54132C7F.6050903@python-academy.de>

Am 12.09.14 17:52, schrieb Skip Montanaro:
> I have slowly been converting some Python source to Cython. I'm pretty
> conservative in what changes I make, mostly sprinkling a few "cdef", "float"
> and "int" declarations around the pyx file. Still, conservative or not, it's
> enough to choke pylint. Rather than have to maintain a pure Python version of
> my code, it would be nice if pylint had a flag or if there was a "cylint" tool
> available.

You should try pure Python mode:
http://docs.cython.org/src/tutorial/pure.html

This allows you to keep your code valid, pure python and put all the Cython
related stuff into decorators. Works pretty well. There might be few places
were it does not work; for example, wrapping C libraries. But you could put
these parts in small, extra files and could still check most of your code.

I would be interested in your experiences with this. So let me know how it
works if you try.

Mike

> 
> A few Google and PyPi searches failed to reveal anything. Is there something
> out there?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Skip
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> code-quality mailing list
> code-quality at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
> 


From skip at pobox.com  Fri Sep 12 20:38:47 2014
From: skip at pobox.com (Skip Montanaro)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:38:47 -0500
Subject: [code-quality] pylint for cython?
In-Reply-To: <54132C7F.6050903@python-academy.de>
References: <CANc-5UzRE3dscU4KDF-DUxiSq3h5_Zg1e7Rf_RXnU_bOM0b8ew@mail.gmail.com>
 <54132C7F.6050903@python-academy.de>
Message-ID: <CANc-5Uy3oKVkKbb_+bWE7xH_HH0scD01Gnh=M7fhPPSqnTkGdA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Mike M?ller <mmueller at python-academy.de>
wrote:

> You should try pure Python mode:
> http://docs.cython.org/src/tutorial/pure.html
>

So I leave my Python code as-is in somemodule.py and put the Cython
declarations in somemodule.pyd. My make targets are map pyd files to so
instead of pyx to so? (I don't use setup.py. I'm very old school.)

Thx,

Skip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/code-quality/attachments/20140912/7b517e06/attachment.html>

From skip at pobox.com  Fri Sep 12 20:45:58 2014
From: skip at pobox.com (Skip Montanaro)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:45:58 -0500
Subject: [code-quality] pylint for cython?
In-Reply-To: <CANc-5Uy3oKVkKbb_+bWE7xH_HH0scD01Gnh=M7fhPPSqnTkGdA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANc-5UzRE3dscU4KDF-DUxiSq3h5_Zg1e7Rf_RXnU_bOM0b8ew@mail.gmail.com>
 <54132C7F.6050903@python-academy.de>
 <CANc-5Uy3oKVkKbb_+bWE7xH_HH0scD01Gnh=M7fhPPSqnTkGdA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANc-5UxCaBNAZUF-J0W8LRg=y=PzjhPceDi2p9HOFEQbnLL86A@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Skip Montanaro <skip at pobox.com> wrote:

> My make targets are map pyd files to so instead of pyx to so?


s/pyd/pxd/
s/are//
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/code-quality/attachments/20140912/5fbf0f84/attachment.html>

From stefan_ml at behnel.de  Fri Sep 12 21:47:33 2014
From: stefan_ml at behnel.de (Stefan Behnel)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 21:47:33 +0200
Subject: [code-quality] pylint for cython?
In-Reply-To: <CANc-5Uy3oKVkKbb_+bWE7xH_HH0scD01Gnh=M7fhPPSqnTkGdA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANc-5UzRE3dscU4KDF-DUxiSq3h5_Zg1e7Rf_RXnU_bOM0b8ew@mail.gmail.com>
 <54132C7F.6050903@python-academy.de>
 <CANc-5Uy3oKVkKbb_+bWE7xH_HH0scD01Gnh=M7fhPPSqnTkGdA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <luvikm$mjk$1@ger.gmane.org>

Skip Montanaro schrieb am 12.09.2014 um 20:38:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Mike M?ller wrote:
>> You should try pure Python mode:
>> http://docs.cython.org/src/tutorial/pure.html
> 
> So I leave my Python code as-is in somemodule.py and put the Cython
> declarations in somemodule.pyd. My make targets are map pyd files to so
> instead of pyx to so?

".py" -> ".so" instead of ".pyx" -> ".so", yes.

Latest Cython also has a "cythonize" script that can compile and build
modules ("cythonize -i pkg/module.py" -> "pkg/module.so").


> (I don't use setup.py. I'm very old school.)

That sounds a bit old-school, yes. To compile a Cython module, it can be as
simple as this:

"""
from distutils.core import setup
from Cython.Build import cythonize

setup(
    ext_modules=cythonize('hello.py'),
)
"""

And it will avoid rebuilding if it's up-to-date, just like make does.

(This is getting quite off-topic for this list, though...)

Stefan



From ben+python at benfinney.id.au  Sat Sep 13 09:52:15 2014
From: ben+python at benfinney.id.au (Ben Finney)
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 17:52:15 +1000
Subject: [code-quality] Request For Comments: Moving Flake8 development
	to Git
References: <CAN-Kwu2gKTnTCOLUX-6J2r7sRCbeyEGkaiHgzt=BDocSqmxJLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5412826A.9070804@ziade.org>
 <CAK2BMQsRmPYskJPxp=u3ckySM93wTeMBkQa3FmPswVey_Ckmyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140912063838.GF2854@logilab.fr>
Message-ID: <85ppf0vtxs.fsf@benfinney.id.au>

Sylvain Th?nault
<sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr> writes:

> On 12 septembre 08:18, Carl Crowder wrote:
> > I think it's a good idea. I personally dislike contributing to
> > hg-based projects because it's such a faff for me compared to using
> > git, and I wouldn't be surprised if others are put off contributing
> > for a similar reason (not that I'm saying the reason is good, I'm just
> > lazy!)
>
> Isn't this rather a question of platform - github vs bitbucket ?

No, using Git doesn't imply GitHub hosting. Likewise, using Mercurial
doesn't imply Bitbucket hosting.

I think it's a better idea to host a repository on something like a
Gitorious instance, since it avoids proprietary extensions (such as
those of GitHub) to ensure there's no lock-in to a specific provider.

So please, mke the decision of which VCS *system* independent of which
*hosting service*. And please choose a hosting service without
proprietary extensions.

> On the command line tool side, I personnaly feel like mercurial is
> easier for newcomers. On the other hand, for power user, the hg+evolve
> workflow is very powerful. Ok, I'm biased since I know more about hg
> than git ;)

I certainly agree that Mercurial is much more straightforward on the
command line than Git.

-- 
 \         ?People's Front To Reunite Gondwanaland: Stop the Laurasian |
  `\              Separatist Movement!? ?wiredog, http://kuro5hin.org/ |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney


From tarek at ziade.org  Sat Sep 13 15:17:55 2014
From: tarek at ziade.org (=?UTF-8?B?VGFyZWsgWmlhZMOp?=)
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 15:17:55 +0200
Subject: [code-quality] Request For Comments: Moving Flake8 development
 to Git
In-Reply-To: <85ppf0vtxs.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
References: <CAN-Kwu2gKTnTCOLUX-6J2r7sRCbeyEGkaiHgzt=BDocSqmxJLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5412826A.9070804@ziade.org>
 <CAK2BMQsRmPYskJPxp=u3ckySM93wTeMBkQa3FmPswVey_Ckmyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140912063838.GF2854@logilab.fr> <85ppf0vtxs.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
Message-ID: <54144403.2060502@ziade.org>

Le 13/09/14 09:52, Ben Finney a ?crit :
> Sylvain Th?nault
> <sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr> writes:
>
>> On 12 septembre 08:18, Carl Crowder wrote:
>>> I think it's a good idea. I personally dislike contributing to
>>> hg-based projects because it's such a faff for me compared to using
>>> git, and I wouldn't be surprised if others are put off contributing
>>> for a similar reason (not that I'm saying the reason is good, I'm just
>>> lazy!)
>> Isn't this rather a question of platform - github vs bitbucket ?
> No, using Git doesn't imply GitHub hosting. Likewise, using Mercurial
> doesn't imply Bitbucket hosting.
>
> I think it's a better idea to host a repository on something like a
> Gitorious instance, since it avoids proprietary extensions (such as
> those of GitHub) to ensure there's no lock-in to a specific provider.
>
> So please, mke the decision of which VCS *system* independent of which
> *hosting service*. And please choose a hosting service without
> proprietary extensions.

This is very true - however the (sad) truth is that having a project on
github.com boosts contributions like nowhere else - and I guess at the
end of the day it's still beneficial for OSS.


Cheers
Tarek

From graffatcolmingov at gmail.com  Sat Sep 13 15:34:30 2014
From: graffatcolmingov at gmail.com (Ian Cordasco)
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 08:34:30 -0500
Subject: [code-quality] Request For Comments: Moving Flake8 development
	to Git
In-Reply-To: <54144403.2060502@ziade.org>
References: <CAN-Kwu2gKTnTCOLUX-6J2r7sRCbeyEGkaiHgzt=BDocSqmxJLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5412826A.9070804@ziade.org>
 <CAK2BMQsRmPYskJPxp=u3ckySM93wTeMBkQa3FmPswVey_Ckmyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140912063838.GF2854@logilab.fr> <85ppf0vtxs.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
 <54144403.2060502@ziade.org>
Message-ID: <CAN-Kwu0KVB5J4MSziB_qU+SpSxVSTYKpq-nBcJByeaXBY7ySUQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/13/14, Tarek Ziad? <tarek at ziade.org> wrote:
> Le 13/09/14 09:52, Ben Finney a ?crit :
>> Sylvain Th?nault
>> <sylvain.thenault at logilab.fr> writes:
>>
>>> On 12 septembre 08:18, Carl Crowder wrote:
>>>> I think it's a good idea. I personally dislike contributing to
>>>> hg-based projects because it's such a faff for me compared to using
>>>> git, and I wouldn't be surprised if others are put off contributing
>>>> for a similar reason (not that I'm saying the reason is good, I'm just
>>>> lazy!)
>>> Isn't this rather a question of platform - github vs bitbucket ?
>> No, using Git doesn't imply GitHub hosting. Likewise, using Mercurial
>> doesn't imply Bitbucket hosting.
>>
>> I think it's a better idea to host a repository on something like a
>> Gitorious instance, since it avoids proprietary extensions (such as
>> those of GitHub) to ensure there's no lock-in to a specific provider.
>>
>> So please, mke the decision of which VCS *system* independent of which
>> *hosting service*. And please choose a hosting service without
>> proprietary extensions.
>
> This is very true - however the (sad) truth is that having a project on
> github.com boosts contributions like nowhere else - and I guess at the
> end of the day it's still beneficial for OSS.

I only replied to Tarek instead of the list. Sorry Tarek that you're
going to get this twice

So given the consensus was to move it away from BitBucket, and we
would like to not get stuck with proprietary sites like GitHub. How
does this plan sound?

We will host the mainline development on an entirely free site -
GitLab - and mirror the repository on GitHub for visibility. We will
disable issues on GitHub but still accept pull requests via GitHub.

My reason for preferring GitLab over Gitorious is that GitLab allows
users to sign in with their GitHub login, so if someone already has a
GitHub account, they can simply authorize GitLab to have read access
to their user data and then create and comment on issues.

Cheers,
Ian

From graffatcolmingov at gmail.com  Sun Sep 21 20:50:05 2014
From: graffatcolmingov at gmail.com (Ian Cordasco)
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 13:50:05 -0500
Subject: [code-quality] Flake8 Development Has Moved
Message-ID: <CAN-Kwu3FNXk6MjGjokJ73XL7FZ5UoRq07PBTwn7phUCM09i_rg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

Flake8 - a linting and style tool that combines pep8, pyflakes, and
mccabe - has moved its development off of BitBucket to GitLab. The
transition from Mercurial to Git was discussed and took place last
weekend. For further information please read this blog post:
http://www.coglib.com/~icordasc/blog/2014/09/flake8-in-transition.html

Cheers,
Ian Cordasco
Flake8 Maintainer and Core Developer

From indigo at bitglue.com  Mon Sep 22 23:00:43 2014
From: indigo at bitglue.com (Phil Frost)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:00:43 -0400
Subject: [code-quality] reclaiming pyflakes maintainership
Message-ID: <CAP4Jji7NScKr83f9iE94Lx4A0GkgwfumgKSHXVPZ4+7PcQxugw@mail.gmail.com>

Would people mind if I re-claimed maintainership of pyflakes? I have the
greatest gratitude for the people who have helped keep it current and
updated all these years, but now I'm finding myself with some time on my
hands and a desire to do something about the open pull requests in github.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/code-quality/attachments/20140922/8253e9ef/attachment.html>

From graffatcolmingov at gmail.com  Mon Sep 22 23:10:06 2014
From: graffatcolmingov at gmail.com (Ian Cordasco)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:10:06 -0500
Subject: [code-quality] reclaiming pyflakes maintainership
In-Reply-To: <CAP4Jji7NScKr83f9iE94Lx4A0GkgwfumgKSHXVPZ4+7PcQxugw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP4Jji7NScKr83f9iE94Lx4A0GkgwfumgKSHXVPZ4+7PcQxugw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAN-Kwu3cp_rnV_V4gt+e31kK1_+tgo8o=wvZkPd2a+uwfF3TZQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Phil Frost <indigo at bitglue.com> wrote:
> Would people mind if I re-claimed maintainership of pyflakes? I have the
> greatest gratitude for the people who have helped keep it current and
> updated all these years, but now I'm finding myself with some time on my
> hands and a desire to do something about the open pull requests in github.

I see no reason why you wouldn't be able to contribute even without
having merge powers (e.g., code review, issue triage on LaunchPad,
etc). I'm not sure who owns/maintains that organization[1] so I'm not
sure who would be capable of adding you. That said, Florent is the
person who maintains pyflakes mostly and I don't doubt he would
appreciate some help.

[1]: There are no public members of the PyFlakes organization
(https://github.com/pyflakes)

From florent.xicluna at gmail.com  Mon Sep 22 23:36:08 2014
From: florent.xicluna at gmail.com (Florent)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 23:36:08 +0200
Subject: [code-quality] reclaiming pyflakes maintainership
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Kwu3cp_rnV_V4gt+e31kK1_+tgo8o=wvZkPd2a+uwfF3TZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP4Jji7NScKr83f9iE94Lx4A0GkgwfumgKSHXVPZ4+7PcQxugw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN-Kwu3cp_rnV_V4gt+e31kK1_+tgo8o=wvZkPd2a+uwfF3TZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPFzasPhff8rT2R4ztkke7EUy33GbGJVa6TkpbDQ1z75u5p82A@mail.gmail.com>

hello Phil,

Thank you for volunteering.
I've added you as co-maintainer of the repository.
I appreciate you come back in the team ;-)

If you want to discuss more thoroughly about some topic, you can join
me by e-mail too.


-- 
Florent



2014-09-22 23:10 GMT+02:00 Ian Cordasco <graffatcolmingov at gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Phil Frost <indigo at bitglue.com> wrote:
>> Would people mind if I re-claimed maintainership of pyflakes? I have the
>> greatest gratitude for the people who have helped keep it current and
>> updated all these years, but now I'm finding myself with some time on my
>> hands and a desire to do something about the open pull requests in github.
>
> I see no reason why you wouldn't be able to contribute even without
> having merge powers (e.g., code review, issue triage on LaunchPad,
> etc). I'm not sure who owns/maintains that organization[1] so I'm not
> sure who would be capable of adding you. That said, Florent is the
> person who maintains pyflakes mostly and I don't doubt he would
> appreciate some help.
>
> [1]: There are no public members of the PyFlakes organization
> (https://github.com/pyflakes)
> _______________________________________________
> code-quality mailing list
> code-quality at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality

From davidhalter88 at gmail.com  Mon Sep 29 12:02:03 2014
From: davidhalter88 at gmail.com (Dave Halter)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:02:03 +0200
Subject: [code-quality]  Jedi gets a new parser
Message-ID: <CAA=HWYgNh0E=Vtqmcx7JZgrge35bvgbmzbC+3Dndx5Bj9jqbsQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all!

I will be writing a new parser for Jedi. This is necessary for a quite a
few reasons described in:
https://github.com/davidhalter/jedi/issues/480.

I'm posting this here, because some of you may be interested in actually
using the new parser. It's going to be pure Python and contrary to the
Python's internal parser will have error recovery and indent positions.

If you're interested, I'd be really glad to hear your feedback!

~ Dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/code-quality/attachments/20140929/3f0d66d3/attachment.html>

From pcmanticore at gmail.com  Mon Sep 29 19:15:12 2014
From: pcmanticore at gmail.com (Claudiu Popa)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:15:12 +0300
Subject: [code-quality] Jedi gets a new parser
In-Reply-To: <CAA=HWYgNh0E=Vtqmcx7JZgrge35bvgbmzbC+3Dndx5Bj9jqbsQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA=HWYgNh0E=Vtqmcx7JZgrge35bvgbmzbC+3Dndx5Bj9jqbsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMy=CLr7ZcftVL53wo+hqJ8B1LhjYOEd-4fEfEFQEwwwTj_Kyg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Dave Halter <davidhalter88 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I will be writing a new parser for Jedi. This is necessary for a quite a few
> reasons described in:
> https://github.com/davidhalter/jedi/issues/480.
>
> I'm posting this here, because some of you may be interested in actually
> using the new parser. It's going to be pure Python and contrary to the
> Python's internal parser will have error recovery and indent positions.
>
> If you're interested, I'd be really glad to hear your feedback!
>
> ~ Dave
>


Hello, Dave.

That's awesome, If your parser can generate a new AST, then we can
definitely use it, although we have
in mind to use lib2to3 to replace the standard ast module for our use
cases, but that can change if your parser
is finished until taking action from our side. Having always correct
information, such as line and col offsets definitely will
help us (we actually have a couple of problems regarding this, where
the lineno for some nodes is different than reality).
Regarding the parser approach, I'm not sure what's best in this situation.
I'm working on a static analysis tool, in the vein of pylint, for the
Powershell language
(https://github.com/RoPython/wispy) where I'm using modgrammar, a
recursive descent top down parser to parse the code
and retrieve an AST from it. modgrammar is pretty good, easy to use,
but slow sometimes and backtracks too much on ambiguities.
But it can memorize whitespace tokens and such, as long as you
explicitly define the whitespace token in the grammar, which
can be a pretty daunting task.

Anyway, if there is something I can help you with your parser, don't
hesitate to send me an email.


Claudiu