[code-quality] Some other additions to PyCQA possibly

[Claudiu Popa]

Hi Carl,

>From my point of view, they could all live in the organisation, at
least pylint-plugin-utils and prospector still
seem useful to folks.

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Carl Crowder <carl.crowder at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> There are a few other things that came out of the ashes of Landscape.io that
> may or may not make sense to move into PyCQA too:
>
> 1) pylint-celery - this one I don’t think anyone uses and it isn’t very
> useful anyway
> 2) pylint-plugin-utils - this is used by pylint-django and pylint-celery as
> far as I know, I’m not sure how useful it is outside of that
> 3) prospector - this is the bigger one, lots of people use this, but I can
> understand that it might not be in the same state of mind as the rest of the
> PyCQA code :-)
>
> Let me know what you think either way!
>
> Carl
>
> _______________________________________________
> code-quality mailing list
> code-quality at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/code-quality
>