[core-workflow] tracker 'resolution'

[Antoine Pitrou]

On sam., 2014-04-19 at 10:53 -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:02:02 +0200, Antoine Pitrou <antoine at python.org> wrote:
> > On ven., 2014-04-18 at 22:59 -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
> > > I would like to collapse and reorder this list as follows:
> > > 
> > >     duplicate
> > >     not a bug
> > >     works for me
> > >     fixed
> > >     postponed
> > >     won't fix
> > >     3rd party
> > 
> > Is "3rd party" a different thing from "not a bug". Often it's "not a
> > bug" because it's a bug somewhere else (perhaps not identified :-)).
> > 
> > Regardless, +1.
> 
> Yeah, "it's a bug somewhere else" doesn't sound very much like "not a bug"
> to the person who reported the issue, so I think 3rd party is worthwhile.
> Also, the number of 3rd party issues that we end up responding to could
> be a useful metric to have.

That's not a problem to me.
(OTOH, it "3rd party" was spelled "third party", I think I would like it
better :-) for some reason, the leading digit looks wrong :-D)

Regards

Antoine.