[core-workflow] tracker 'resolution'

[R. David Murray]

On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:43:51 -0400, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2014 06:04, "Antoine Pitrou" <antoine at python.org> wrote:
> >
> > On ven., 2014-04-18 at 22:59 -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
> > > I would like to collapse and reorder this list as follows:
> > >
> > >     duplicate
> > >     not a bug
> > >     works for me
> > >     fixed
> > >     postponed
> > >     won't fix
> > >     3rd party
> >
> > Is "3rd party" a different thing from "not a bug". Often it's "not a
> > bug" because it's a bug somewhere else (perhaps not identified :-)).
> 
> That would be the resolution used for things like bugs in pip, or errors in
> a patched distro version. Ideally it would require a URL that referenced
> the bug in the other projects issue tracker, but that can go in a comment
> easily enough.

At some point I think it would be great to add tooling to support that (a
list of 3rd party bug tracker URLs that can autocomplete like nosy does).
For now just putting it in the comment works fine.

--David