[core-workflow] tracker 'resolution'

R. David Murray rdmurray at bitdance.com
Sat Apr 19 17:15:18 CEST 2014


On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:49:30 -0400, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2014 00:47, "Ned Deily" <nad at acm.org> wrote:
> >Further down the minimalist route, perhaps "works for me" could be
> >collapsed into "not a bug" as well.  That distinction seems hazy
> >enough to make it difficult to apply the two consistently.
> 
> To my mind, "works for me" is closer to "can't fix". The closest resolution
> we use in Red Hat Bugzilla would likely be "INSUFFICIENT DATA" - the bug
> report is too incomplete for us to reproduce the error or otherwise
> identify the actual problem (if any).

Yeah, I thought about that, but I didn't want to suggest *adding*
resolutions at this point.  We may want something like 'insufficient
data' later, though.  Or I suppose we could rename "works for me" to be
that, if other people think it is accurate enough.

--David


More information about the core-workflow mailing list