[core-workflow] tracker 'resolution'
R. David Murray
rdmurray at bitdance.com
Sat Apr 19 17:29:35 CEST 2014
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 16:58:47 +0200, Antoine Pitrou <antoine at python.org> wrote:
> On sam., 2014-04-19 at 10:53 -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
> > Yeah, "it's a bug somewhere else" doesn't sound very much like "not a bug"
> > to the person who reported the issue, so I think 3rd party is worthwhile.
> > Also, the number of 3rd party issues that we end up responding to could
> > be a useful metric to have.
>
> That's not a problem to me.
> (OTOH, it "3rd party" was spelled "third party", I think I would like it
> better :-) for some reason, the leading digit looks wrong :-D)
Good idea. I just copied the original 'versions' text without thinking
about it.
Consider it done (because it is). If anyone objects, it is easy enough
to change it back :)
--David
More information about the core-workflow
mailing list