[core-workflow] Tracker workflow proposal

Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Mon Apr 21 22:42:16 CEST 2014


On Apr 21, 2014, at 04:29 PM, R. David Murray wrote:

>I have to say that as an outsider looking in, this was *totally*
>confusing.  I signed up to see 'python' bugs, and most of the traffic
>on the tickets seemed to be about changes to things that looked like
>other tickets but I guess were bug tasks.
>
>Our case would be more straightforward...but I'm still not sure that
>the extra complexity would be worth it.

Right.  It makes a lot more sense when you're working on multiple packages
across the distro instead of primarily on a single package.

It may not make sense for the Python tracker, where you're essentially working
on a single project, although I wonder if adding alternative implementations,
or subprojects (e.g. idle) might make it more relevant.  Anyway, I was mostly
just throwing that out there to think about.

-Barry

P.S. I'll mostly leave the blocker/deferred discussion to active RMs, since
they're most affected by it.  But I think it probably does make sense to have
a release-manager role with certain additional privileges.


More information about the core-workflow mailing list