[core-workflow] Tracker workflow proposal

Jessica McKellar jessica.mckellar at gmail.com
Tue Apr 22 05:53:43 CEST 2014


Hi David,

Thanks for taking the time to write this up.

Aside from some small concerns, for example around auto-closing
tickets, which others have already voiced, I just wanted to say that
I'm enthusiastic about this outline. In particular, I'm enthusiastic
about making it clearer what tasks are available for new contributors,
triagers, and committers. I think this will have a big impact on
getting and retaining contributors.

> 'easy' of course has to be set manually.  The system for listing easy
> issues should list the issues only when there is an action that someone
> could take on the issue (clarify issue, write patch, review patch).
> (NB: it might be possible to come up with a better name for this tag.)

Some folks get discouraged by "easy" tickets not seeming that easy. A
common alternative tag is "bitesized".

Straying off topic to talk about workflow documentation:

The easy tag is often not set consistently by projects (or it's
forgotten until a dash to comb through tickets before sprints to add
it). Making the easy tag a triage checklist item could help with that.

I think new contributors would also appreciate the clarity of a patch
submission checklist.

I am in general a big fan of checklists. :) I also volunteer myself to
help update the devguide as the workflow gets updated.

-Jessica


More information about the core-workflow mailing list