[core-workflow] Questions about the proposed workflows

Donald Stufft donald at stufft.io
Tue Dec 1 18:58:13 EST 2015


> On Dec 1, 2015, at 6:53 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> 
> (A bigger question might be if merging a patch across three branches will become any easier. At this point I'm reluctant to accept small asyncio PRs because I have to merge then into 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6. But I expect that this would be a matter of git command line tricks regardless of the hosting platform.)

If the original PR was to the 3.4 branch, once you merge it you can, in the web ui, create a new PR that merges 3.4 into 3.5, then 3.5 into 3.6. That’s about the best that’s available right now.

-----------------
Donald Stufft
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/attachments/20151201/a5489262/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/attachments/20151201/a5489262/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the core-workflow mailing list