[core-workflow] Questions about the proposed workflows

[Donald Stufft]

> On Dec 2, 2015, at 2:45 PM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 02 Dec 2015 14:23:41 -0500, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 2:21 PM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> That's interesting.  I thought someone had already tried travis and our
>>> test suite took too long to run.  Sounds like Kushal's stuff could be
>>> hooked up to gitlab.
>> 
>> Unless I did it wrong, the tests took 11 minutes to run, Travis allows up to 50.
>> 
>> https://travis-ci.org/fake-python/cpython/jobs/89432399
> 
> That looks OK.  Maybe they changed their limits?  50 sounds way longer
> than I remember whoever it was (Kushal?) quoting.
> 

It’s been 50 minutes for as long as I can remember, but there is an additional limit of 10 minutes without any output, so if it was being run in a way that didn’t cause output to occur for 10 minutes it’d get killed.


-----------------
Donald Stufft
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/attachments/20151202/3825038f/attachment.sig>