[core-workflow] Questions about the proposed workflows

[Nick Coghlan]

On 15 December 2015 at 17:32, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
> Only if the review system is used. You still have split brain problems for people merging manually or pushing direct to master.

Right, but that's just "git-with-a-different-host" regardless of the
specific web interface in use - if it was set up, any such mirror repo
would be read/write from a "you can submit and work with change
requests here", rather than "you can use git to push updates here".

Cheers,
Nick.

>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Dec 14, 2015, at 10:58 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> going with a bot-based workflow even
>> means that we could even offer a read-write GitLab mirror in the
>> future, since the bot would handle the actual merge-and-commit process
>> based on review comments, regardless of which server was used to
>> submit the review.



-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia