[core-workflow] Other thoughts on the workflow

[Nick Coghlan]

On 30 November 2015 at 14:31, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
> I don’t believe Github even has an option where you *have* to use the
> web-based merge process. The closest thing they have is protected branches
> (disables force pushes, but not regular pushes) and required status checks
> (PRs have to pass certain pre merge tests before the merge button lights
> up).

You're right, I was thinking of the GitLab variant of protected
branches, where you can turn off pushing entirely for folks with
Developer permissions in order to require that all changes go through
the review process:
http://doc.gitlab.com/ce/workflow/protected_branches.html

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia