[core-workflow] New Github Features

Ryan Gonzalez rymg19 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 14 10:39:55 EDT 2016


Generally, if you also squash the second PR, it won't be hard to merge it,
since you're resolving a small set of conflicts. If the second one consists
of 10 commits, then the world will likely explode.

--
Ryan
[ERROR]: Your autotools build scripts are 200 lines longer than your
program. Something’s wrong.
http://kirbyfan64.github.io/
On Apr 14, 2016 4:15 AM, "Antoine Pitrou" <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 15:07:21 +1000
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 2 April 2016 at 06:59, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> > > So this support of squash merging may be useful. It really depends on
> how we
> > > try and support porting changes between versions and Misc/NEWS.
> >
> > Having the bot handle squashing is likely still desirable, since the
> > flow you really want is:
> >
> > - squash & rebase the PR
> > - run the test suite/build the docs (depending on modified files)
> > - commit if successful
>
> What happens if there's a PR based on another PR? When the latter is
> squash-merged, the former will likely end up with many conflicts since
> git won't be able to reconcile the histories anymore.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> core-workflow mailing list
> core-workflow at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow
> This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct:
> https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/attachments/20160414/de2fad5a/attachment.html>


More information about the core-workflow mailing list