[core-workflow] Choosing a code coverage reporter

[Brett Cannon]

Codecov was the clear winner among people who left a reaction on the issue
and it's also my personal choice, so the code coverage reporter has been
chosen! Thanks to everyone who helped out with it.

On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 at 12:08 Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:

> I have both Codecov and Coveralls up and running. If you have an
> opinion/preference, please vote at
> https://github.com/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test/issues/27 using the
> reactions on the appropriate comment (.e.g +1/-1 reaction for Codecov
> and/or Coveralls). Links to the code coverage results are in the issue. If
> people want to see how they interact with PRs, feel free to look at
> https://github.com/brettcannon/cpython-ci-test/pull/32 (once the CI run
> is finished).
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/attachments/20161203/fe28e7f6/attachment.html>