[core-workflow] We will be moving to GitHub

[Brett Cannon]

On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 at 20:39 Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote:

> First, let me add my thanks for sorting this out!
>
> On Jan 2, 2016 11:45, "Brett Cannon" <brett at python.org> wrote:
> > Well, "support" as in "allow". We won't be keeping Rietveld around (part
> of this move is so we can get off of Rietveld).
>
> I guess I'd missed this point.  In my opinion, code review in Github is
> unpleasant for anything but small PRs and even for those when there's much
> back-and-forth.  At work we switched to Github.  We moved code review off
> to reviewboard a few months later.  Setting up the webhooks between the two
> wasn't hard and code review was a much better experience.  Just my 2c.
>

No one proposed that workflow so it wasn't considered (and I'm obviously
not about to start the process again ;). If we find that GitHub isn't
working out for code review then we can discuss how to remedy it, but
that's not something to consider until we have been done with the
transition for several months at least for people to form an informed
opinion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/attachments/20160103/97f081bf/attachment.html>