[core-workflow] We will be moving to GitHub

[Brett Cannon]

Rietveld is no longer an option as our fork of the project is unmaintained
(it was one of the key reasons we even started this process).

On Sun, Jan 3, 2016, 10:28 Stefan Krah <skrah.temporarily at gmail.com> wrote:

> Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at ...> writes:
> > I guess I'd missed this point.  In my opinion, code review in Github is
> unpleasant for anything but small PRs and even for those when there's much
> back-and-forth.  At work we switched to Github.  We moved code review off
> to
> reviewboard a few months later.  Setting up the webhooks between the two
> wasn't hard and code review was a much better experience.  Just my 2c.
>
> Agreed. Our current Rietveld setup is superior and much less distracting.
>
> Like the Rietveld house vs. Victorian architecture.
>
>
> Stefan Krah
> _______________________________________________
> core-workflow mailing list
> core-workflow at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow
> This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct:
> https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/attachments/20160103/83dec12d/attachment.html>