[core-workflow] My initial thoughts on the steps/blockers of the transition

[Senthil Kumaran]

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>
>
> Why would you want this?
>

In general, our changes to 2.7 are separate from 3.x lines. So the pull
requests and reviews could be handled separately.

We could encourage feature contributions only to cpython (3.x) repo and any
maintainance improvements from the folks who have 2.7 in production could
be handled in 2.7 repo separately.

Also, I was mapping our hg branches to git repos.

Currently we have 3.4->3.5->default (active)
And 2.7(active)

-- 
Senthil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/attachments/20160105/28514a4f/attachment.html>