[core-workflow] GitHub reviews comments on b.p.o

[R. David Murray]

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:08:52 -0700, Senthil Kumaran <senthil at uthcode.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:57 PM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote:
> > The general consensus (a while back) was that the fact that reitveld
> > doesn't update the bug tracker issue is a bug, and we're trying to fix
> > that :)
> 
> Haha. Interesting.
> 
> Github sends one email for every comment, it does not have a "draft" +
> "publish" comments mechanism that Rietveld has.
> This has the potential to create a lot of churn for some patches/reviews.

The obvious alternative is to just post a link to the PR with some
summary about what was posted (perhaps who and how many comments?).  I
don't have an opinion at this point which would be better, but the core
of the proposed patch would be the same, just the output would be
different.

--David