[core-workflow] Coverage reporting through Travis?
Oleg Broytman
phd at phdru.name
Mon Nov 21 17:31:12 EST 2016
Hi!
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:22:36PM +0000, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> As for coverage-reporting services, I know of https://codecov.io/ and
> https://coveralls.io/. If people have any other recommendations I'm open to
> hearing about them.
The only minor difference between them that I know of is: if one
updates a pull request using force-push codecov updates its comment and
coveralls adds a new comment every time. See for example this PR:
https://github.com/andialbrecht/sqlparse/pull/279 - I've updated it 5
times; there is one updated comment from codecov and 5 comments from
coveralls.
If you prefer one way or the other - you know what to choose.
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytman http://phdru.name/ phd at phdru.name
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
More information about the core-workflow
mailing list