[core-workflow] Choosing a prefix/label for issue numbers

Berker Peksağ berker.peksag at gmail.com
Wed Feb 1 13:14:35 EST 2017


On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> Historically commit messages for CPython have had the form of "Issue #NNNN:
> did something". The problem is that Github automatically links "#NNNN" to
> GitHub issues (which includes pull requests). To prevent incorrect linking
> we need to change how we reference issue numbers.
>
> The current candidates are:
>
>    issue NNNN (notice the lack of #)

+1

>     bug NNNN

As an ex-Mozillian, +1 :)

>     bpo NNNN ("bpo" stands for "bugs.python.org")

+0

--Berker


More information about the core-workflow mailing list