[core-workflow] Choosing a prefix/label for issue numbers

[Brett Cannon]

On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 at 13:21 Alexander Belopolsky <
alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
>
> bpo NNNN ("bpo" stands for "bugs.python.org")
>
>
> Shouldn't it be bpo-NNNN for consistency with gh-NNNN?
>

It could be. It's really up to us as I've never seen anyone actually use
GH-NNNN in the wild (I honestly didn't know about it until I pulled up the
docs to respond to Matthias).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/attachments/20170201/eb76a85c/attachment.html>