[core-workflow] Choosing a prefix/label for issue numbers
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Wed Feb 1 17:29:51 EST 2017
On 1 February 2017 at 22:36, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 at 13:21 Alexander Belopolsky
> <alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
>>> bpo NNNN ("bpo" stands for "bugs.python.org")
>> Shouldn't it be bpo-NNNN for consistency with gh-NNNN?
>
> It could be. It's really up to us as I've never seen anyone actually use
> GH-NNNN in the wild (I honestly didn't know about it until I pulled up the
> docs to respond to Matthias).
For what it's worth, NAME-12345 is the way JIRA handles autolinking of
references, since it assumes the JIRA instance is specific to a
particular organisation and lets you specify short prefix codes for
the projects.
One benefit of a hyphen based syntax would be reducing the temptation
to add in the "#" before the issue number.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
More information about the core-workflow
mailing list